Film Noir Review: Armored Car Robbery (1950)

“Tough break, Marsha.”

The heist movie is a subset of film noir that rewards brevity. The characters in these films are professionals, articulate men who find success in choosing their actions and their words carefully. Mere seconds can mean the difference between the take of a lifetime and a lifetime behind bars. As such, the best heist movies are often the ones in which the filmmakers mirror these lean attributes. Stanley Kubrick’s The Killing is 85 minutes. Both The Italian Job and Reservoir Dogs are a slim 99 minutes. Even Drive, a film characterized by its visual bombast, comes in at 100 minutes.

Then there’s Armored Car Robbery, perhaps the leanest and meanest the genre ever produced. At a taut 67 minutes, the film stands out for its minimalist approach to action and its ability to coerce memorable scenes from a premise that was already becoming clichéd by the 1950s. There are no fresh ideas to be found here, but rather an appreciation for the craft, and the visceral excitement of seeing men with guns chase each other through the streets of Los Angeles.

The colorful poster for Armored Car Robbery.

The colorful poster for Armored Car Robbery.

A brawny policeman named Cordell (Charles McGraw) tries to nab a criminal named Purvis (William Talman) after the latter stole from an armored car and killed Cordell’s partner. As one can probably infer, there are lots of moments where Cordell is acting tough and scolding other cops for not getting results. There are also lots of moments where Purvis is acting slimy and saying things like “No loose ends baby!” while waving a pistol in the air. They’re caricatures of their given profession, walking embodiments of lawman and loser, but the performances of McGraw and Talman are so riveting that they manage to elevate their pulpy material.

McGraw was the closest we ever got to a real life Mike Hammer. Like the fictional shamus, he was a hulking man whose mere presence carried the threat of violence, and whose allegiance couldn’t be won over by women or cheap flash. As a henchman, he was the unstoppable force who pummeled heroes like Dennis O’Keefe (T-Men, Raw Deal) and Ricardo Montalban (Border Incident) until they gunned him down. He rarely ever made it to the final reel.

Cordell (Charles McGraw) and the police close in on Purvis.

Cordell (Charles McGraw) and the police close in on Purvis.

Armored Car Robbery was the first time McGraw played against type, and seeing him try to hide his steely ferocity under a badge gives his Cordell a unique tension. It feels as though he could crack at any moment, and unleash a mean streak that would make the criminals he’s after look like punk teenagers. He doesn’t show mercy to his enemy, nor does he mince words with his friends. After learning that his partner was killed, he consoles the widow with almost frivolous detachment: “Tough break, Marsha.” He has a mission to carry out, and little to no time to take stock of his emotions.

Talman, who carries the criminal portions of the film, provides a similarly exciting turn. He takes the character of Purvis and colors him with tedious little bits that distinguish from the average crook. He insists that his flunkies never write anything down. He tears the tags off his shirts, and fancies himself a sharp dresser when he’s not planning million dollar heists. The script, penned by Gerald Drayson Adams and Earl Felton, never allows us to root for Purvis, but Talman is so gleefully bad, so smitten with what he does, that one can’t help but feel a bit of sorrow when his plans go awry. Talman would continue to hone his mean streak with films like City That Never Sleeps and The Hitch-Hiker, playing men so similar they could have been Purvis’ relatives.

Purvis hides out from the police.

Purvis hides out from the police.

Beyond capturing the actors, Richard Fleischer directs as though his storyboards were culled from building schematics. He moves the camera with precision and clarity, particularly during the scenes where Purvis and his crew are hiding out. Rather than a series of rapid cuts, a standoff culminates with a single take of a gun being picked up, fired, and then panning down to reveal a dead body. It is compact storytelling at its finest, and a prime example of how Fleischer was able to condense so much into an hour.

The director also shows off his talent for staging when Cordell visits Purvis’ home. He places Cordell in the top left corner of the frame, suspiciously looking over the parking garage, while Purvis lurks in the bottom right, hiding behind a car and waiting to pounce. That the teased confrontation doesn’t happen here only escalates our desire to get to the finale, and Fleischer is smart enough to exploit this desire. He would go on to revisit the film’s best pieces, including the clever staging and the casting of McGraw, for his next release, the B-movie masterpiece The Narrow Margin.

Cordell fires off his pistol.

Cordell fires off his pistol.

Armored Car Robbery was recently featured on the TCM series Noir Alley, and its reputation has grown over the years, but its influence on the genre as a whole still goes undiscussed. Along with The Asphalt Jungle, which was released during the same month in 1950, Armored Car Robbery helped normalize the heist as a kind of film noir that catered to action fans and suspense fans alike. Genre clichés have only gotten worse with time, but the colorful performances and direction still make this heist worth seeing. B

TRIVIA: Armored Car Robbery was often shown as the bottom-half of a double feature with another unique film noir, The Good Humor Man.

…..

–Danilo Castro for Classic Movie Hub

Danilo Castro is a film noir specialist and Contributing Writer for Classic Movie Hub. You can read more of Danilo’s articles and reviews at the Film Noir Archive, or you can follow Danilo on Twitter @DaniloSCastro.

Posted in Posts by Danilo Castro | 4 Comments

Noir Nook: Ripped from the Headlines – Ace in the Hole (1951)

Noir Nook: Ripped from the Headlines – Ace in the Hole (1951)

For this month’s Noir Nook, I’m starting a new series, taking a look at several films noirs that are based on real-life events. I confess that I’ve always gotten a little jolt of excitement whenever I’ve seen the words “Based on a True Story” on the screen, probably ever since I saw Brian’s Song on the ABC Movie of the Week. (Am I dating myself? Never mind.)

Ace in the Hole (1951) Kirk Douglas and Jan Sterling Movie PosterKirk Douglas and Jan Sterling star in Ace in the Hole (1951).

For the first film in my “Ripped From the Headlines”’ series, I’m taking a look at Ace in the Hole, a 1951 Paramount Pictures feature. The film stars Kirk Douglas as Chuck Tatum, an unprincipled former big-city reporter who’s been fired from 11 publications and is endlessly frustrated with his current position on a paper in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Desperate to find a story that will catapult him back to the big time in New York, Tatum finds it when he learns of a man, trading post owner Leo Mimosa, who’s trapped in a nearby cave. He manipulates the relatively simple rescue into a lengthy ordeal that thrusts him into nationwide prominence but ends in tragedy for the focus of the story and, ultimately, Tatum himself.

Ace in the Hole (1951) Cave Scene with Kirk Douglas and Richard BenedictLeo Mimosa (Richard Benedict) lays trapped while Chuck Tatum (Kirk Douglas) shows him the newspaper report on his dire situation.

Directed with great skill by Billy Wilder, Ace in the Hole also stars Jan Sterling as the trapped man’s self-centered wife, Ray Teal as the corrupt sheriff who aids the reporter’s efforts, and Richard Benedict as the hapless victim of Tatum’s machinations. It was a flop when it was first released – the unrelentingly grim tale was a turnoff to most critics and moviegoers alike, and changing the name to The Big Carnival when it was re-released didn’t help much.

Ace in the Hole was based on the life of Floyd Collins, a cave explorer in central Kentucky, who’d discovered a cave in 1917 – Crystal Cave – that was operated as a tourist attraction by his family. The cave’s proximity to the more popular Mammoth Cave, however, meant that the Collins attraction wasn’t much of a moneymaker. In late January 1925, seeking to increase the family coffers, Collins determined to explore the little-known Sand Cave and made a deal with the cave’s owner to split the profits if it proved to be a success.

Striking out on his own, and armed only with a single kerosene lamp, Collins entered Sand Cave, frequently having to squeeze through tight passageways and even crawl on his stomach to make his way. At one point, he became pinned by a 27-pound rock, either by accidentally knocking over his lamp or by dislodging the rock with his foot. Regardless of how it happened, Collins was trapped.

The cave explorer’s plight was discovered the following day, and a full-scale effort went into effect to extricate him. Well-intentioned rescuers began converging on the area, including state and local lawmen, miners, stone cutters, the National Guard, physicians, and reporters. One reporter was 21-year-old William Burke Miller (known as “Skeets” because of his small stature) from the Louisville Courier-Journal, who went into the cave several times to interview Collins. (Unlike Chuck Tatum, though, Miller tried his best to help Collins, reportedly even scraping some of the skin from this hands in an effort to dig the man out.)

Floyd Collins Sand Cave Newspaper Headline 1925 Race with Death to Reach Floyd CollinsNewspaper reads “Race With Death to Rach Floyd Collins”

Meanwhile, a carnival-type atmosphere had sprung up outside the cave, with masses of vendors setting up shop to sell foods and beverages, balloons, and a variety of tonics and elixirs. A progression of ministers arrived to pray for Collins’s soul, and gawkers numbered in the tens of thousands, parking for miles around in every direction.

A variety of theories had emerged on the best way to carry out the rescue, from Vaseline to an oxyacetylene torch to burn away the rock. For the first four days, rescuers were able to get food and water to Collins, but two cave-ins completely cut off the entrance passageway, and it was determined that the only way to reach Collins was through a shaft sunk straight down in the earth. This slow and painstaking process took nearly two weeks, and by the time the rescuers reached Collins, he had died from lack of food and water, compounded by hypothermia.

HIstoric Sand Cave sign remembering explorer Floyd Collins January 30, 1925 accidental deathThe historic Sand Cave sign remembering explorer Floyd Collins’ accidental death on January 30, 1925.

The next year, Skeets Miller won a Pulitzer Prize for his coverage of the tragedy. Also that year, a singer/songwriter name Vernon Dalhart released “The Ballad of Floyd Collins,” selling a whopping 3 million copies. (In the film, a song was performed by a singer and a band outside the cave. Titled “We’re Coming, Leo,” it was written by the team of Ray Evans and Jay Livingston, who also wrote “Buttons and Bows,” “Mona Lisa,” and “Que Sera Sera,” and made a cameo appearance in Wilder’s Sunset Boulevard.)

After the 1951 release of the movie, director Billy Wilder – who co-wrote the screenplay and also served as producer – was sued for plagiarism by one Victor Desny. An actor and budding screenwriter, Desny claimed that he’d contacted Wilder’s secretary to pitch the idea of a film based on Collins. Wilder’s lawyer argued that the Collins story was not governed by copyright laws and that Desny’s phone call was not a formal story submission. A judge ruled in Wilder’s favor in 1953, but three years later, the California State Supreme Court overturned the decision and Wilder wound up paying Desny approximately $15,000.

One more tidbit about the film – in it, the Chuck Tatum character mentions both the Collins tragedy and Skeets Miller’s prize-winning reporting, providing a unique marriage of truth and fiction.

Stay tuned for my next look at a film noir Ripped from the Headlines!

– Karen Burroughs Hannsberry for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Karen’s Noir Nook articles here.

Karen Burroughs Hannsberry is the author of the Shadows and Satin blog, which focuses on movies and performers from the film noir and pre-Code eras, and the editor-in-chief of The Dark Pages, a bimonthly newsletter devoted to all things film noir. Karen is also the author of two books on film noir – Femme Noir: The Bad Girls of Film and Bad Boys: The Actors of Film Noir. You can follow Karen on Twitter at @TheDarkPages.
If you’re interested in learning more about Karen’s books, you can read more about them on amazon here:

 

 

Posted in Noir Nook, Posts by Karen Burroughs Hannsberry, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 9 Comments

Win Tickets to see “TCM Big Screen Classics: The Sound of Music” (Giveaway runs through Aug 25)

Win tickets to see “The Sound of Music” on the Big Screen!
In Select Cinemas Nationwide Sun Sept 9 and Wed Sept 12!

“Silver white winters that melt into springs, these are a few of my favorite things”

CMH continues into our 3rd year of our partnership with Fathom Events – with the 11th of our movie ticket giveaways for 2018, courtesy of Fathom Events!

That said, we’ll be giving away EIGHT PAIRS of tickets to see “TCM Big Screen Classics: The Sound of Music – Robert Wise’s timeless adaptation of the Rodgers and Hammerstein musical — the way it was meant to be seen – on the Big Screen!

In order to qualify to win a pair of movie tickets via this contest, you must complete the below entry task by Saturday, August 25 at 6 PM EST.

We will announce the winner(s) on Twitter on Sunday, August 26, between 6PM EST and 7PM EST. If a winner(s) does not have a Twitter account, we will announce that winner(s) via this blog in the comment section below.

the sound of music

The film will be playing in select cinemas nationwide for a special two-day-only event on Sunday, Sept 9 and Wednesday, Sept 12 at 2:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. local time. Winners will be responsible for their own transportation to the Event. Only United States entries are eligible. Please click here before you enter to ensure that the Event is scheduled at a theater near you and that you are able to attend. (please note that there might be slightly different theater listings for each date)

ENTRY TASK (2-parts) to be completed by Saturday, Aug 25 at 6PM EST…

1) Answer the below question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog post

THE QUESTION:
What do you love most about “The Sound of Music”? And, if you haven’t seen it, why do you want to see it on the Big Screen?

2) Then TWEET* (not DM) the following message:
I just entered to win tickets to see “TCM Big Screen Classics Presents: The Sound of Music” on the Big Screen courtesy of @ClassicMovieHub & @FathomEvents #EnterToWin #CMHContest link here: http://ow.ly/209P30lhdQp

*If you don’t have a Twitter account, you can still enter the contest by simply answering the above question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog — BUT PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU ADD THIS VERBIAGE TO YOUR ANSWER: I do not have a Twitter account, so I am posting here to enter but cannot tweet the message.

NOTE: if for any reason you encounter a problem commenting here on this blog, please feel free to tweet or DM us, or send an email to clas@gmail.com and we will be happy to create the entry for you.

ALSO: Please allow us 48 hours to approve your comments. Sorry about that, but we are being overwhelmed with spam, and must sort through 100s of comments…

the sound of music, the hills are alive, Julie Andrews

About the film: Rodgers & Hammerstein’s® cinematic treasure, “The Sound of Music” is the winner of five Academy Awards, including Best Picture. In this true-life story, Julie Andrews lights up the screen as Maria, a spirited young Austrian woman who leaves the convent to become a governess for Captain von Trapp’s (Christopher Plummer) seven unruly children. Her charm and songs soon win the hearts of the children – and their father. But when Nazi Germany unites with Austria, Maria is forced to attempt a daring escape with her new family. This special event includes exclusive insight from Turner Classic Movies host Ben Mankiewicz.

Please note that only United States residents are eligible to enter this giveaway contest. (see contest rules for further information)

BlogHub members ARE also eligible to win if they live within the Continental United States (as noted above).

You can follow Fathom Events on Twitter at @fathomevents

Good Luck!

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Contests & Giveaways, Fathom Events, Posts by Annmarie Gatti | Tagged , | 42 Comments

Living with Grace: Life Lessons from America’s Princess – Book Giveaway (Aug)

“Living with Grace: Life Lessons from America’s Princess ”
Book Giveaway

“I think of myself as a modern, contemporary woman who has had to deal with all kinds of problems that many women today have had to deal with.” – Grace Kelly

And, now we’re happy to announce our next contest! This time, we’ll be giving away EIGHT COPIES of “Living with Grace: Life Lessons from America’s Princess” courtesy of Lyons Press and author Mary Mallory!

living with grace: life lesson's from America's princess

In order to qualify to win one of these prizes via this contest giveaway, you must complete the below entry task by Saturday, September 1 at 10PM EST. However, the sooner you enter, the better chance you have of winning, because we will pick a winner on four different days within the contest period, via random drawings, as listed below… So if you don’t win the first week that you enter, you will still be eligible to win during the following weeks until the contest is over.

  • Saturday, Aug 11: Two Winners
  • Saturday, Aug 18: Two Winners
  • Saturday, Aug 25: Two Winners
  • Saturday, Sept 1: Two Winners

We will announce each week’s winner on Twitter @ClassicMovieHub (or via this blog, depending how you entered), the day after each winner is picked at 10PM EST — for example, we will announce our first week’s winners on Sunday Aug 12 at 10PM EST.

…..

ENTRY TASK (2-parts) to be completed by Saturday, September 1 at 10PM EST — BUT remember, the sooner you enter, the more chances you have to win…

1) Answer the below question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog post

2) Then TWEET (not DM) the following message:
Just entered to win the “Living with Grace: Life Lessons from America’s Princess” #BookGiveaway courtesy of @Lyons_Press author @mallory_mary & @ClassicMovieHub contest link here: http://ow.ly/kejD30lhdiP

THE QUESTION:
What do love most about Grace Kelly and/or her films and why?

*If you do not have a Twitter account, you can still enter the contest by simply answering the above question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog — BUT PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU ADD THIS VERBIAGE TO YOUR ANSWER: I do not have a Twitter account, so I am posting here to enter but cannot tweet the message.

Please allow us at least 48 hours to approve (and post) your comment, as we have an unprecedented amount of spam to sift through…

…..

About the Book: Poised, cultured, and unforgettable, Grace Kelly had the aura of a princess, even before she was crowned. She exuded grace, polish, flair, and serenity as a fashion icon, actor, and humanitarian. Living with Grace is a captivating look at this elegant woman who has been an inspiration for many and whose legacy enlightens a new generation of fans. Seldom seen photos and outtakes are complemented by inspiring quotes from and about Grace and the famous roles she played. These words and images highlight what made her so iconic on film and in life.

Please note that only Continental United States (excluding Alaska, Hawaii, and the territory of Puerto Rico) entrants are eligible.

And — BlogHub members ARE eligible to win if they live within the Continental United States (as noted above).

…..

For complete rules, click here.

And if you can’t wait to win, you can buy it now on amazon:


…..

Good Luck!

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

 

Posted in Books, Contests & Giveaways, Posts by Annmarie Gatti | Tagged , , | 25 Comments

That Was Entertainment: The Golden Age of the MGM Musical – Contest Giveaway (Aug)

“That was Entertainment: The Golden Age of the MGM Musical”
Book Giveaway

Calling all musical fans! It’s time for our next contest! This time, I am thrilled to say that CMH will be giving away EIGHT copies of  “That was Entertainment: The Golden Age of the MGM Musical” by author Bernard F. Dick, courtesy of University Press of Mississippi.

In order to qualify to win a copy, you must complete the following task by Saturday, Sept 1 at 9PM EST. However, the sooner you enter, the better chances you have of winning, because we will pick winners on four different days within the contest period, via random drawings, as listed below… So if you don’t win the first week that you enter, you will still be eligible to win during the following weeks until the contest is over.

  • Saturday, Aug 11: Two Winners
  • Saturday, Aug 18: Two Winners
  • Saturday, Aug 25: Two Winners
  • Saturday, Sept 1: Two Winners

We will announce the winner(s) on Twitter and/or this blog, the day after each winner is picked at 9PM EST (for example, we will announce the first two winners on Sunday August 12 at 9PM EST on Twitter or this blog depending on method of entry). 

that was entertainment: the golden age of the MGM musical

…..

ENTRY TASK (2-parts) to be completed by Saturday, Sept 1 at 9PM EST — BUT remember, the sooner you enter, the more chances you have to win…

1) Answer the below question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog post

2) Then TWEET* (not DM) the following message:
Just entered to win the “That was Entertainment: The Golden Age of the MGM Musical”  #BookGiveaway courtesy of  @upmiss & @ClassicMovieHub contest link here: http://ow.ly/ARyF30lhcMW 

THE QUESTION:
What is one of your favorite musicals and why? (doesn’t necessarily have to be an MGM title)

*If you do not have a Twitter account, you can still enter the contest by simply answering the above question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog — BUT PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU ADD THIS VERBIAGE TO YOUR ANSWER: I do not have a Twitter account, so I am posting here to enter but cannot tweet the message.

ALSO: Please allow us 48 hours to approve your comments. Sorry about that, but we are being overwhelmed with spam, and must sort through 100s of comments…

…..

About the Book: That Was Entertainment uniquely reconstructs the life of Arthur Freed, whose unit at MGM became the gold standard against which the musicals of other studios were measured. Without Freed, Judy Garland, Gene Kelly, Fred Astaire, Ann Miller, Betty Garrett, Cyd Charisse, Arlene Dahl, Vera-Ellen, Lucille Bremer, Gloria DeHaven, Howard Keel, and June Allyson would never have had the signature films that established them as movie legends. MGM’s past is its present. No other studio produced such a range of musicals that are still shown today on television and all of which are covered in this volume, from integrated musicals in which song and dance were seamlessly embedded in the plot (Meet Me in St. Louis and Seven Brides for Seven Brothers) to revues (The Hollywood Revue of 1929 and Ziegfeld Follies); original musicals (Singin’ in the Rain, Easter Parade, and It’s Always Fair Weather); adaptations of Broadway shows (Girl Crazy, On the Town, Show Boat, Kiss Me Kate, Brigadoon, Kismet, and Bells Are Ringing); musical versions of novels and plays (Gigi, The Pirate, and Summer Holiday); operettas (the films of Jeanette MacDonald and Nelson Eddy); mythico-historical biographies of composers (Johann Strauss Jr. in The Great Waltz and Sigmund Romberg in Deep in My Heart); and musicals featuring songwriting teams (Rodgers and Hart in Words and Music and Kalmar and Ruby in Three Little Words), opera stars (Enrico Caruso in The Great Caruso and Marjorie Lawrence in Interrupted Melody), and pop singers (Ruth Etting in Love Me or Leave Me). Also covered is the water ballet musical–in a class by itself–with Esther Williams starring as MGM’s resident mermaid. This is a book for longtime lovers of the movie musical and those discovering the genre for the first time.

…..

Please note that Continental United States (excluding Alaska, Hawaii, and the territory of Puerto Rico) and Canadian entrants are eligible.

And — BlogHub members ARE eligible to win if they live within the Continental United States or Canada (as noted above).

See complete contest rules here.

And if you can’t wait to win the book, you can purchase the on amazon via the below link (click on image below):

…..

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Books, Contests & Giveaways, Posts by Annmarie Gatti | Tagged , | 57 Comments

Pre-Code Corner: A Look at the Atlanta Better Films Committee

A Look at the Atlanta Better Films Committee

I spend many a Tuesday evening buried in the Motion Picture Association of America Production Code Administration (PCA) records housed at the Academy’s Margaret Herrick Library in Beverly Hills. My first exposure to these gems took place in 2007 when I visited the library to research for my senior thesis on Baby Face (1933). Since then, I’ve flipped through at least 100 files, both digitally and on paper, and I’ve become familiar with the types of correspondence and documentation most records contain. One item I’m always thrilled to stumble upon is a Reviewer’s Report from the Atlanta Better Films Committee because 80% of the entries include pointed, irate, and occasionally over-the-top comments that I happen to find very humorous.

Atlanta Better Films Committee Reviewers Report for Mata Hari (1932)Exhibit A: A Reviewer’s Report from the Atlanta Better Films Committee for the 1932 film Mata Hari. Enjoy!

Though Better Films committees were formed in countless cities, for the most part, I only spot Atlanta reports in the PCA files. Curious, I started to investigate the group’s history, which mirrors the efforts of other self-censoring entities during the pre-Code era. The National Committee on Better Films spun off the National Board of Review of Motion Pictures, which was established in 1909 to promote voluntary picture regulation. The idea of the new association was to work jointly with theater owners and request “finer pictures” from exhibitors to ward off calls for state censorship and “build” audiences up for more quality entertainment, which the boards would throw their full support behind.

Atlanta Better Films Committee City of Atlanta, Georgia AffiliationIf you squint, you can make out the city of Atlanta representing as an affiliated Better Films Committee.

Realizing the potential collective power their members held, the National Board dispatched supporters to advocate for local Better Films committees across the country; in Georgia, the campaigner was “educational expert” and religious educator Louise Connolly. Despite the fact that she found it difficult to get the word out in the early 1920s (for one, ministers were apprehensive of her connection with the movie industry), by 1923 the Atlanta Women’s Club embraced the idea of Better Films boards. From there, the seed was planted and sprouting quickly; the following year, Atlanta Better Films Committee President Mrs. Alonzo Richardson declared that “selection and cooperation,” not censorship, “will solve the problems of the industry.”

As history would show, that attitude struggled in effectiveness – for the National Board, Better Films organizations, and the Studio Relations Committee (SRC) in Hollywood. As for the Atlanta body, even though they denounced censorship, the group indeed tried to repress at least one picture. In 1929, members attempted to bar The Very Idea from screening at the Rialto, but the theater owner fought back; in fact, he filed an injunction to ensure there would be no interference with the booking. (The film was already approved by the National Board of Review, which had basically become a censor authority, and they refused to withdraw their consent when the Atlanta board pushed for it, as the latter acted more as an advisory arm.) Not only did Atlanta’s attempt fail, but it actually inspired the opposite effect: As reported by The Film Daily, “the attendant newspaper notoriety proved a box-office boost for the film which played to such good business that it is being held over for another week.”

Atlanta Better FIlms Committee The Very Idea Poster (1939)If you look up The Very Idea on IMDb, you’ll get an idea as to why the Atlanta Better Films Committee wanted this one stopped.

The Very Idea episode reveals several similarities between a group like the Atlanta Better Films Committee and the SRC. From 1930-1934, the latter was basically a consultative organization with no real authority to demand changes, very much like the Atlanta association. Additionally, the SRC, along with select critics and religious/social organizations, also lamented how publicity and infamy from questionable content could entice viewers to see what all the hubbub was about, which is exactly the scenario the Atlanta Better Films Committee caused. For instance, critic Mae Tinee reported on Baby Face: “If, after all these years, producers are to make pictures like Baby Face because pictures like Baby Face are what the public demands, then I throw up my hands. [Now I suppose you’ll all go and take a look at the film and thus encourage the industry to turn out some more like it].”

Calls for cleaner entertainment certainly didn’t produce it, especially during the pre-Code era, and neither the Better Films committees nor the SRC could do anything about it. When it became clear that the fight for higher quality pictures wasn’t panning out and boycotts loomed in the horizon in 1934, the hammer finally slammed down. With that, adherence to the Production Code became mandatory in the summer of 1934, as the industry feared any notion of federal censorship that could result from the pressure placed upon them by outside moral groups. And that is what finally tidied up the picture business – at least, for the most part.

With that brief historical overview, below are some choice comments and impressions from the Atlanta Better Films Committee, along with select overview of the grading points, which, as the first image in this article demonstrates, consisted of: * (exceptional), A (very interesting), B (interesting), F (fair) and —- (not recommended), as well as a chart of areas to grade: entertainment value, acting, plot, photography, educational value, and moral effect. To be honest, I’m not sure exactly how some of these remarks help advocate for better pictures, as many of these reports seem to serve as an outlet for members to voice their dissatisfaction with the era’s entertainment offerings. But hey, they are amusing, nonetheless.

Red-Headed Woman Jean Harlow MGM Movie Poster Advertisement (1932)I’m sure MGM wasn’t ashamed of Red-Headed Woman racking up these box office receipts.

Red-Headed Woman (1932)
Not surprisingly, this picture was not recommended. In fact, the reviewer didn’t even bother to fill the grading chart out. At all. The only item marked was “not recommended.” Oh, and the general comments section is a gem: “I can’t imagine [sic] a writer with a mind so low as to write a play of this kind, much less one who would produce it on the screen. It’s disgusting. I think every American should be ashamed of the company that produced Red Headed Woman.”

Shanghai Express (1932)
Curiously, Shanghai Express was marked as “not recommended” with “bad” scripted in by “moral effect”; yet, the film received marks of A across the board – save for the aforementioned negative ethical influence. The general comments were certainly conflicted: “A picture of educational value” that seemingly was spoiled for the reviewer by “an immoral love story that is not true to life.”

Clark Gable and Joan Crawford in Possessed (1931)These two (Clark Gable and Joan Crawford) look like they are up to no good in Possessed.

Possessed (1931)
This movie notched A’s for entertainment, acting, and photography; an F for plot; and a scrawled “bad” for moral effect. Those are surprisingly high marks, considering what was written in the comment section: “What are the moral standards of writers and producers when they produce a picture of this type. The story is awfully disgusting. We don’t want pictures of this kind.” So, let me get this straight. This viewer didn’t approve of a film that she nevertheless found “very interesting” in the entertainment department? Was she against fun?

An American Tragedy (1931)
You’re in for a special treat with this one. Apparently, news of An American Tragedy’s production so enraged the group that they penned a proclamation against the picture being made. In March 1931, Atlanta Better Films Committee President Mrs. Patrick Bray decreed:

It has come to our knowledge that there is again a movement to film Dreiser’s GREAT AMERICAN TRAGEDY, be it RESOLVED that the Better Films Committee of Atlanta protest against the filming of this book, RESOLVED FURTHER That we respectfully urge that we be given a definite promise that this book will not be filmed, and an assurance that the promise will be kept. RESOLVED FURTHER That a copy of these resolutions be sent to the Hays organization in New York and in Hollywood, and to the National Board of Review, in New York.

Also noted at the bottom, for an extra punch: “Passed unanimously at a meeting of over one hundred. Every civic organization represented. Six ministers present.” Spoiler alert: The movie was indeed produced and distributed, though it did thoroughly incense several people and groups, including author Theodore Dreiser (who sued and lost); the mother of the real-life murder victim Grace Brown (who sued and settled); and censor boards in Italy, England, and South Africa, which banned the film. Oh, and presumably the Atlanta Better Films Committee, too.

Hot Saturday (1932) Movie Poster Starring Cary Grant, Nancy Carroll, and Randolph Scott. Paramount PicturesOK, I can see how this tagline may rub those of high moral standing the wrong way.

Hot Saturday (1932)
General comments for this selection were all over the place: “Comedy not recommended very course (sic) and suggestive all the way. Nancy Carroll plays a clean innocuous part of perhaps a happy, light-hearted girl. Very good lesson against gossip. Mother’s love was not what it should be. Lesson for girls innocent acts can be mis judged (sic). Avoid the appearances of evil.” Bad/good/educational/what?

Mata Hari (1932)
Mata Hari is another selection to only merit a check mark by “not recommended.” The comments for this one are among my favorite: “I wish this picture could be destroyed. It is not fit to be shown any where [sic].” I would have loved if this reviewer expanded upon the reasoning behind such a harsh condemnation.

How morally confused are some of those comments, huh? It’s ironic that most of the reviewers were able to grasp and even appreciate various facets of the motion picture experience – such as acting, entertainment value, photography – yet they totally got hung up on plot points they deemed objectionable. Interestingly, I failed to find mentions of the Atlanta Better Films Committee in publications past the late 1940s, which leads me to believe that the group eventually disbanded, was phased out, or something of the sort as their pursuits became more and more ineffective, just as happened with the Production Code in the later 1950s and 1960s.

Note: Researching this group was not easy. I found a number of mentions in the Media History Digital Library before landing upon Jennifer Fronc’s excellent Monitoring the Movies, which details the Progressive-era fight against state censorship in favor of the promotion of higher quality pictures. If you happen to have any further information on this group, please feel free to share in the comments!

–Kim Luperi for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Kim’s Pre-Code Corner articles here.

Kim Luperi is a New Jersey transplant living in sunny Los Angeles. She counts her weekly research in the Academy’s Production Code Administration files as a hobby and has written for TCM, AFI Fest, the Pre-Code Companion, MovieMaker Magazine and the American Cinematheque. You can read more of Kim’s articles at I See A Dark Theater or by following her on twitter at @Kimbo3200.

Posted in Posts by Kim Luperi, Pre-Code Corner | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

FilmStruck Forum: Chaplin, Bogie and an Undiscovered Gem

FilmStruck Forum: Chaplin, Bogie and More
Exploring the Streaming Movie Service

As I continue to explore and acclimate to FilmStruck, I’m finding that my biggest ‘problem’ is trying to decide what to watch.  But alas, I’m muddling through making those difficult decisions, and in the process, I’m having a lot of fun — I’m seeing some movies that I haven’t seen in ages (and they’re bringing back some wonderful memories), some that I thought I never saw but did (with some deja vu moments), and some that I’ve never ever seen before (or even heard of)…

So, for my 2nd FilmStruck Forum post, I’d like to share three films that I thoroughly enjoyed this month…

…..

THE CIRCUS, 1928

the circus 1928 lobby card
The Circus, 1928, directed, produced, written by, and starring Charlie Chaplin

Anyone who knows me, knows that I adore Charlie Chaplin films… And FilmStruck has an impressive selection of them, including City Lights, Modern Times, The Gold Rush, The Kid, Limelight, Monsieur Verdoux and The Great Dictator, among others.  This time around, I decided to watch The Circus — mainly because I own the soundtrack and fell in love with the song “Swing Little Girl” (sung by Chaplin)  from the first time I heard it.

As it turns out, I’d seen this film before, although I didn’t remember it until I was about 15 minutes in – but that was perfectly alright by me, as there were still many surprises for me as the film unfolded. In a nutshell, Chaplin plays the Tramp who unwittingly stumbles into a job and stardom at the Circus, and who falls in love with the Ringmaster‘s stepdaughter along the way… I always marvel at Chaplin’s mastery of acrobatics, and I wasn’t disappointed here — his timing is impeccable and he makes everything look so natural — whether he’s falling over something, knocking something down — or walking a tightrope. Although his character in this film was not as sympathetic for me as in other Chaplin films, I was absolutely moved by the ending — an ending, by the way, that I never expected. Definitely worth seeing if you’re a Chaplin fan.

the circus chaplin tightropeChaplin walking the tightrope – before he’s covered in monkeys (don’t ask 🙂

Fun Facts:

  • The Circus was the 7th-highest grossing silent film in cinema history taking in more than $3.8 million in 1928.
  • The song “Swing Little Girl” was added to the soundtrack by Chaplin for the 1969 re-issue of the film.
  • Chaplin did walk the tightrope himself… he practiced tightrope walking for weeks before filming and performed on a rope 40 feet in the air. That footage was damaged however and Chaplin had to re-shoot. Chaplin believed that the new footage, which was included in the film, was not as good as the original/lost footage.
…..

DEAD END, 1937

dead-end-1937 lobby card
Dead End, 1937, directed by William Wyler, and the first film starring The Dead End Kids

My next pick was one that I hadn’t seen in ages – and one that my Mother introduced me to as a kid — so needless to say it brought back some fond memories 🙂  Seeing this one on FilmStruck was a welcomed and pleasant surprise for me. I have such vivid memories of this one growing up… Set in the slums on the East Side of NYC, sweet sis Drina (Sylvia Sidney) waits for her knight in shining armor, honest architect Dave (Joel McCrea) is frustrated by lack of work and tempted by rich mistress Kay (Wendy Barrie), gangster Baby Face Martin (Bogie) returns home to heart-broken mom (Marjorie Main), and Drina’s gone-astray kid brother Tommy (Billy Halop) gets into real trouble with the Dead End Kids. I thoroughly enjoyed this one… and, not to completely give away the ending, I will just say that crime doesn’t pay…

dead end kids in dead end 1937The Dead End Kids at their ‘hangout’ in the NYC slums by the East River

Fun Fact:

  • The set was painstakingly created for the studio… the actual Dead End was in NYC on the corner of East 53rd Street and the East River. The pier and the tenements are long gone now, but you can look for traces around Sutton Place Park and FDR Drive exit 11.

…..

PANAMA HATTIE, 1942 

panama-hattie-movie-poster-1942Panama Hattie, 1941, directed by Norman Z. McLeod

This one I had never seen before, and what a pleasant surprise it was! Starring Ann Sothern, Red Skelton, Dan Dailey and Lena Horne, this is a fun musical — but what struck me most were the dance performances of The Berry Brothers! I must admit, I never heard of them before – but wow. I will be watching this one again for their wonderful dance scenes. A new discovery for me, and you can bet that I will be exploring more Berry Brothers films.

berry brothers panama hattie

Fun Fact:

  • In 1938, The Berry Brothers faced off with The Nicholas Brothers in a historic dance competition at NY’s Cotton Club.
  • You can see some Berry Brothers youtube clips here.

…..

And just to remind everyone, we’re giving away LOTs of FilmStruck subscriptions this year, courtesy of FilmStruck. So stay tuned… 

And, if you don’t want to wait to win a subscription, you can enjoy an EXCLUSIVE 30-day Trial by clicking here.filmstruck exclusive 30-day trial subscription

Thanks for reading, and see you next month!

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

 

Posted in FilmStruck Forum, Posts by Annmarie Gatti | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

What’s Happening in Classics: August 2018

The CMH Guide for August 2018:
Movie Screenings, 
TV Schedules, Contests and More!

Welcome to our monthly ‘CMH Guide’ for Classics! And welcome August! We’re hoping this classic movie & TV guide will help you plan some classic viewing fun… If we’re missing a classic channel, just let us know and we’ll be happy to add it!

What's happening in classic movies and tv classic movie hub guide

…..

TCM Summer Under the Stars 2018

TCM…

  • One of our favorite TCM ‘traditions’ — Summer Under the Stars!  31 Days, 31 Stars… A different star is featured every day on TCM, all month long. August 1-31.
    • Here’s a PDF schedule for your planning purposes
    • And for a quick overview:
      • Frank Sinatra, Wed 8/1
      • Myrna Loy, Thurs 8/2
      • Lionel Atwill, Fri 8/3
      • Clint Eastwood, Sat 8/4
      • Katharine Hepburn, Sun 8/5
      • Audrey Totter, Mon 8/6
      • Harold Lloyd, Tues 8/7
      • Jeanette MacDonald, Wed 8/8
      • Walter Matthau, Thurs 8/9
      • Dorothy Malone, Fri 8/10
      • Gary Cooper, Sat 8/11
      • Doris Day, Sun 8/12
      • George Brent, Mon 8/13
      • Lupe Velez, Tues 8/14
      • Peter Finch, Wed 8/15
      • Miriam Hopkins, Thurs 8/16
      • Barbra Streisand, Fri 8/17
      • Clark Gable, Sat 8/18
      • Judy Garland, Sun 8/19
      • Stewart Granger, Mon 8/20
      • Anita Louise, Tues 8/21
      • Dana Andrews, Wed 8/22
      • Virginia Mayo, Thurs 8/23
      • Peter Lorre, Fri 8/24
      • Carroll Baker, Sat 8/25
      • Anthony Quinn, Sun 8/26
      • Agnes Moorehead, Mon 8/27
      • Lew Ayres, Tues 8/28
      • Lauren Bacall, Wed 8/29
      • Marcello Mastroianni, Thurs 8/30
      • Joan Crawford, Fri 8/31

For more info about what’s playing on TCM this month, visit the TCM Movie Schedule at CMH here.

…..

Filmstruck aug 2018

FilmStruck… subscription needed…

  • Contest: Our initial contest is over, but check back soon because we’ll be launching a new contest soon!
  • Films: Fresh content added in this month’s library from “Panama Hattie” starring Lena Horne, Ann Sothern and Red Skelton to “The Time Machine” starring Rod Taylor
  • Featured Collections: The films of Billy Wilder, Brit Noir, Miss Marple, Natalie Wood and more!
  • Podcast: Alicia Malone hosts a lively podcast with fascinating guests…
  • FilmStruck Forum: CMH just launched our monthly FilmStruck Column – join the conversation!

Especially for CMH Fans:) a 30-Day Free Filmstruck Trial

filmstruck exclusive 30-day trial subscription

…..

movies tv network logo

Movies TV Network…

  • Always a nice collection of classics mixed into the Movies TV Network schedule (which also includes more recent films). This month’s mix includes Requiem for a Heavyweight, King Creole, The Family Jewels, Murphy’s Romance, The Owl and the Pussycat, Zorba the Greek, Stalag 17, Sherlock Holmes in Washington, Peyton Place and more.
  • And Sunday Night Noir – this month with The Big Heat, Black Widow, Sunset Blvd and more.
  • Where to Watch.

…..

GetTV-logo

GetTV… Classic Movies and Retro TV…

…..

MeTV_logo

MeTV…

…..

Antenna_TV_logo

Antenna TV…

…..

Decades_TV_Logo

Decades TV… 

  • The Decades TV schedule includes The Ed Sullivan Show, I Love Lucy, Our Miss Brooks, The Donna Reed Show, The Mary Tyler Moore Show, Petticoat Junction, The Dick Cavett Show and more.
  • And here’s a list of the TV shows.
  • Where to Watch.

…..

pluto tv logo

Pluto TV… Would love to know what you think of this free streaming movie service… There’s a reason 🙂

  • Pluto TV is like an old-school TV set — you flip through the channels to see what’s on. The good news is that the service is FREE, and they have a Classic Movie Channel and a Classic TV Channel – among other fun channels.  Would love to know what you think…
  • Classic Movie Channel
  • Classic TV Channel

…..

Fathom-events logo

Fathom Events “TCM Big Screen Classics”… movies on the Big Screen at select theaters nationwide…

  • Contest: We’re giving away EIGHT PAIRs of tickets to see South Pacific  – Enter by Aug 11 to win tickets – in celebration of the film’s 60th anniversary!
  • Check back on this blog on Aug 6th – when we kick off our “The Sound of Music” Ticket Giveaway!
  • And check back again on this blog on Aug 17th – when we kick off our “Rebel without a Cause” Ticket Giveaway!
  • For the full schedule of ‘TCM Big Screen Classic’ movie screenings, visit the Fathom Events listing at CMH here.
fathom events tcm big screen classics 2018
Click above to see the full Fathom Events classic movie schedule

…..

cmh classic movie hub

Blogathons…

For a full listing of Blogathons, click here. Or add your own and we will help promote it.

TCM Parties for June… Follow along and live tweet using the #TCMParty hashtag…

Check out the complete list and times here.

Movie Screenings across the US…

From Indiscreet to Rio Bravo and more, check out the CMH Event Calendar to see what’s playing at Theaters across the US including:

If we’re missing a ‘classic movie’ theater in your neighborhood, please let us know!

ClassicMoviesEvents300 cropped
Click above to visit the CMH Events Calendar

And of course our Monthly Contests! Including:

  • The Big Country 60th Anniversary Blu-Ray Giveaway (contest ends Aug 4)
  • Kino Classic Blu-Ray/DVD Giveaway (contest ends Aug 4) – winners’ choice of the western classic The Big Country, Alfred Hitchcock’s Under Capricorn, Fritz Lang’s The Woman in the Window, or family favorite The Adventures of Tom Sawyer – TWO VERSIONS: via Twitter and via our Blog/Facebook. FEEL FREE TO ENTER BOTH 🙂
  • South Pacific Movie Tix – Fathom “TCM Big Screen Classics” 60th anniversary screenings  – we have 8 pairs of tix to giveaway (contest ends Aug 11)
  • Why To Kill a Mockingbird Matters Book Giveaway (contest ends Aug 18)
  • That Was Entertainment: The Golden Age of the MGM Musical – (check back on this blog on Aug 6th for the contest kick-off)
  • Living with Grace: Life Lessons from America’s Princess – (check back on this blog on Aug 7th for the contest kick-off)
  • The Sound of Music movie tickets – Fathom “TCM Big Screen Classics” (check back on this blog on Aug 6th for the contest kick-off)
  • Rebel Without a Cause movie tickets – Fathom “TCM Big Screen Classics” (check back on this blog on Aug 17th for the contest kick-off)
  • And stay tuned for our next FilmStruck Annual Subscription Giveaway!

For a listing of all of our CMH contests, click here.

And a Happy Classic Viewing to All!

…..

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Posts by Annmarie Gatti, What's Happening in Classics | Tagged , , , , , | 2 Comments

Western Roundup: John Wayne Favorites

Western Roundup: John Wayne Favorites – Leading Ladies

When film fans think of John Wayne Westerns, his classic films with John Ford and Howard Hawks are often the first which come to mind.

Similarly, when one thinks of Wayne’s leading ladies, the first actress many fans think of is doubtless his five-time costar Maureen O’Hara. The feisty women O’Hara portrayed were a perfect match for Wayne’s strong characters, giving as good as she got in films such as Rio Grande (1950), The Quiet Man (1952), and McLintock! (1962).

Looking beyond Wayne’s best-known films and leading lady, here are my three favorite Wayne Westerns made with directors other than Ford or Hawks. These films are particularly special because in each case there’s an outstanding role for the lead actress. Each of these female characters is unique, but they have in common the possession of an inner strength which makes them the right match for the Duke.

…..

John Wayne and Ella Raines in Tall in the Saddle (1944)John Wayne & Ella Raines in Tall in the Saddle (1944).

Tall in the Saddle (Edwin L. Marin, 1944) costarring Ella Raines

Tall in the Saddle is a relatively unknown little gem of a Western. It takes a fairly ordinary story regarding a land dispute and pumps it up with a strong cast and a fast-paced script with some excellent, often funny dialogue, co-written by costar Paul Fix. (An example of a favorite exchange: A shocked woman gasps to Wayne “I saw you hit that man!” and he laconically replies, “Yes, ma’am, just as hard as I could!”) Wayne plays Rocklin, who arrives in a dusty Western town to take a job on a ranch but discovers his employer has recently died. He’s offered a new job by Arly Harolday (Raines) — simply because she’s mad at him and wants the pleasure of firing him later on! Or so she says. A complicated mystery ensues, with multiple people conspiring to cover up the rightful owner of some land…and frame Rocklin for murder.

Ella Raines as Arly Harolday in Tall in the Saddle (1944)Ella Raines as Arly Harolday in Tall in the Saddle (1944).

Raines’ character doesn’t show up until nearly a third of the way into the movie, but her entrance is memorable; she erroneously believes Rocklin robbed her brother (Russell Wade) in a card game and proceeds to shoot in Rocklin’s general direction several times. (That’s followed by another funny moment as Wayne’s baffled character then heads for the saloon bar to recover and gasps “Whiskey!”) After hiring Rocklin, Arly gradually becomes more sympathetic to him but still can’t quite decide if she wants to shoot him or kiss him, but she increasingly leans in the latter direction. At one point Arly comments that she always gets what she wants, and there’s no doubt she wants Rocklin and is going to have him, even though she may have competition from the sweet, more ladylike Clara (Audrey Long). The fiery Raines and laid-back Wayne have tremendous chemistry, and it’s rather a shame they didn’t make more films together.

…..

John Wayne and Gail Russell Laying in the Grass in Angel and the Badman (1947)John Wayne & Gail Russell lay in the grass in Angel and the Badman (1947).

Angel and the Badman (James Edward Grant, 1947) costarring Gail Russell

Angel and the Badman is not simply a favorite Wayne film, it’s one of my all-time favorite movies, period. Wayne plays Quirt Evans, a gunslinger who is wounded and rescued by the Worths, a Quaker family. As Quirt gradually regains his strength while staying on the Worths’ farm, he and lovely Penny (Russell) fall in love. Will Quirt decide to put his violent past behind him…and will he be able to? Marshal Wistful McLintock (Harry Carey Sr.) may hold some of the answers.

John Wayne and Gail Russell in Angel and The Badman (1947).Look, Penny… I am not that kind of guy who does things suddenly. I gotta look before I leap. You can ask anybody, they will tell you.”

Wayne gives a splendid performance, much of it nonverbal, as he comes to terms with his feelings for Penny. Russell’s Penny may look delicate and fragile on the outside, but there’s no stopping this young woman when she makes up her mind, and she falls for Quirt from the moment she lays eyes on him. She doesn’t hesitate to be honest and direct with Quirt about her feelings, and in an amusing scene, she shows that despite her angelic demeanor, she’s also capable of a little jealousy. She helps Quirt envision a life without violence, although they both learn there are times when a gun will still be necessary; and when her man is in danger, she insists on going to his side, despite having recently been deathly ill. In short, she’s the kind of determined woman with whom a man like Quirt can and should build a future.

…..

John Wayne and Geraldine Page in Hondo (1953)John Wayne and Geraldine Page in Hondo (1953).

Hondo (John Farrow, 1953) costarring Geraldine Page

Hondo, based on a wonderful novel by Louis L’Amour, was written for the screen by James Edward Grant, who also wrote and directed Angel and the Badman. Wayne plays a character not too dissimilar from his gunslinger in Angel and the Badman, though Hondo Lane, an Army dispatch rider, is older and has a past which includes a few settled years living with an Indian wife.

After losing his horse while on a dispatch mission, Hondo stumbles across an isolated desert ranch inhabited only by Angie Lowe (Geraldine Page) and her little boy Johnny (Lee Aaker). Hondo tries to convince them to leave with him, as there’s unrest among the Indians, but Angie refuses to abandon her lifelong home, insisting that her husband will return soon and that the family has always gotten along with Indians. But when Hondo arrives at the army outpost he discovers that Angie’s husband (Leo Gordon) is a no-good son of a gun; back at the ranch, while Indian chief Vittorio (Michael Pate) takes a liking to Johnny and prevents harm from coming to the Lowes, he insists that Angie must take an Indian husband if her husband doesn’t return soon. Fortunately, Hondo is reunited with Angie and Johnny, with Hondo and Angie having a second chance to consider their futures.

John Wayne and Geraldine Page in Hondo (1953)“When the Indians wind up their squaw-seeking ceremony, they only say one word. ‘Varlebena’ – It means forever.”

Page’s Angie may be the most courageous of the three women in these films, bringing up her son alone in an environment where there is a constant risk from nature, disease, or Indians. While it’s clear by the end of the film that she’s inwardly faced the reality of her bad marriage head-on, she keeps the truth from Johnny, believing he will grow up stronger if his ideas aren’t crushed, and indeed, she’s doing a wonderful job with him. Still, while she’s accomplished a great deal, there are some things a woman alone can’t do, like throw her six-year-old in the creek to teach him to swim, and Hondo soon fits in very well as both a father figure and potential husband.

I like that Page isn’t conventionally pretty, which Angie and Hondo acknowledge in a conversation, but Hondo can see past that and falls for her spunky character. Like Penny in Angel and the Badman, Angie has the courage to be direct in confessing her feelings for Hondo; having been through one disappointing marriage, she isn’t about to miss out on a good man when she sees one. And just as Angie had the courage to live in the middle of nowhere, she’s also got the gumption to abandon her home for a new start in California; I couldn’t help wondering what, if anything, she had time to grab from her old life before they hightailed it off of the ranch with the army! Angie Lowe is a fascinating character, and Wayne and Page make a slightly unusual yet wonderful couple in an outstanding Western.

 …

– Laura Grieve for Classic Movie Hub

Laura can be found at her blog, Laura’s Miscellaneous Musings, where she’s been writing about movies since 2005, and on Twitter at @LaurasMiscMovie. A lifelong film fan, Laura loves the classics including Disney, Film Noir, Musicals, and Westerns.  She regularly covers Southern California classic film festivals.  Laura will scribe on all things western at the ‘Western RoundUp’ for CMH.

Posted in Posts by Laura Grieve, Western RoundUp | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 17 Comments

Vitaphone View: Sound Without Talking

Vitaphone View: Sound Without Talking

The early months of 1928 saw the transition from silent pictures to talkies ramp up big time. After The Jazz Singer premiered in October 1927, Warner Bros committed to releasing virtually all of its features with a synchronized soundtrack using their Vitaphone sound-on-disk process. But that does not mean those films including any talking. In fact, few did.

The Jazz Singer See and Hear Ad (1928)A 1928 “See and Hear” ad for The Jazz Singer.

The beginning of 1928 also saw all of the other major studios, including MGM, Paramount, First National and Universal, banding together in an agreement that essentially said they would take a wait-and-see attitude to gauge the public’s reaction to talkies. None of them would switch to sound unless all of them did.

The wait was very short.

By spring, it was clear that the public wanted sound, and only Warner Bros and Fox (with its sound-on-film process) were giving it to the public. So over the next six months, each of the other studios began to transition to talkies. But most were still not talkies at all. The overwhelming number of features released “with sound” had no dialog. Instead, custom recorded synchronized music and sound effects soundtracks were created. From a marketing standpoint, the studios already recognized that advertising a picture as “With Sound” meant a mediocre film would likely do much more business than a superb silent.

Exhibitors’ publications like Motion Picture Herald, Film Daily, and Exhibitors Herald World quickly adopted definitions for each type of synchronized film so that theatres would understand what they were getting:

Film Sound Key Vitaphone

A Key to Sound Symbols for a sound-on-disc film.

“SYNCHRONIZED” or “WITH SOUND” – meant no dialog, just music, and sound effects.

PT or ME – meant “Part Talking” or “Musical score & Effects only”. These were hybrid films, usually already completed as silent, to which dialog scenes were subsequently filmed and tacked on to the silent film prior to release. This allowed studios to advertise such pictures with the “SEE AND HEAR” or “HEAR ___ TALK” taglines without revealing that the picture only had snippets of dialog.

SILENT – no soundtrack of any kind. The best silent features increasingly did poorly at the box office as 1928 progressed.

AT – all talking. This meant there was synchronized dialog and music throughout the entire length of the feature. Studios for awhile often released silent versions of such films in order to accommodate theatres not yet wired for sound.

See and Hear Ad for The Barker (1928)See and Hear Ad for The Barker (1928).

The transition from silent to sound was compressed into only about 30 months, if The Jazz Singer’s release is seen as the starting point, and the end of 1929, with virtually no more silent pictures being produced, as the end. Because of its speed, the studios had over 100 completed or in-production silent pictures during this period, and the need to maximize their box office performance. As such, many already finished silent features received synchronized music-and effects soundtracks before release.

The process for a studio to get a synchronized music and sound effects score created, recorded, then pressed onto disks largely fell to the Victor Talking Machine Company in Camden, NJ. The company was already in the business of pressing 16” soundtrack disks for studios, and since the beginning of the century was the largest producer of commercial 78s for the home. At the beginning at least, only MGM and Warner Bros appear to have done music and effects soundtracks themselves (while still using Victor to press the disks.) Beginning in mid-1928, Victor worked with United Artists, First National, Paramount, Universal, Pathe, and Hal Roach to provide this service. The completed final edit of the film would be shipped to Camden, and Victor’s musical directors (who also led their commercial 78’s recordings) created a custom score to fit the action. A combination of current pop tunes and classical and mood themes would be interwoven into the soundtrack.

Singing Fool Poster See and HearA Poster for The Singing Fool (1928) advertising “See and Hear”.

For a feature-length picture requiring a complete synchronized orchestral score with sound effects, the cost could add $100,000 to the budget. But studios rightly believed that being able to then advertise a film as “With Sound” or “See and HEAR!” would boost ticket sales by much more.

Needless to say, the feature scores were major undertakings, as the surviving Victor recording ledger sheets confirm. Orchestras often used more than 25 musicians along with sound effects and vocal personnel. Some sample ledger sheets are included here.

Show Girl (1928) Victor LedgerVictor Ledger from Show Girl (1928).
Charlie Chase Victor LedgerA Victor Ledger for a Charlie Chase film.
Victor Ledger for Synthetic Sin (1929)Victor Ledger for Synthetic Sin (1929).
Victor Ledger for Warming Up (1928)Victor Ledger for Warming Up (1928).

Here is my Vitaphone synchronized soundtrack disk with music and sound effects for Colleen Moore’s next-to-last silent feature Why Be Good? The restored film is available through Warner Archive:

Colleen More and Neil Hamilton in Why Be Good? (1929)Colleen More and Neil Hamilton in Why Be Good? (1929).
See and Hear Ad for Colleen Moore's Why Be Good? (1929)“See and Hear” Ad for Colleen Moore’s Why Be Good? (1929).

My personal favorite of the disk-scored silent features is one of the very last. It’s Buster Keaton’s final silent picture, Spite Marriage, released in the spring of 1929. The soundtrack beautifully blends appropriate period pop tunes — like “Afraid of You” which applies to his relationship in the film with Dorothy Sebastian — with recognized mood music tunes. This clip demonstrates the masterful original Vitaphone track for this overlooked gem. Towards the end, the tune being played is “We Roll Along, Having Our Ups And Downs” while the pair indeed does just that.

A clip from Spite Marriage (1929).
Still Shot from Show Girl (1928)A still shot from Show Girl (1928).

During the past few years, a number of late twenties silent films — long thought lost — have been found. These include Alice White’s 1928 First National features Showgirl and Naughty Baby and Colleen Moore’s last two silent, Synthetic Sin and Why Be Good? Once discovered, efforts began immediately to locate their surviving Vitaphone music and effects soundtrack disks. In all cases, they were found (although Synthetic Sin is missing all but one) and restored with the picture elements. Watching – and hearing – these discoveries as originally released with their intended hot twenties musical accompaniments is the only way to now enjoy them. Any attempt at a modern recreation or score, to me, is sacrilegious.

With Sound ad for Synthetic Sin (1929)“With Sound” ad for Synthetic Sin (1929).

– Ron Hutchinson, Founder of The Vitaphone Project, for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Ron’s Vitaphone View articles here.

Ron is widely recognized as one of the country’s foremost film historians, with special emphasis on the period covering the transition to sound (1925-30) and early attempts to add sound to film. As the founder of The Vitaphone Project, he has worked with Warner Brothers, UCLA, LOC and private collectors worldwide to find previously lost soundtrack discs and restore early sound shorts. Ron’s unique knowledge has  been sourced in over 25 books as well as documentaries for PBS and TCM, and commentary for “The Jazz Singer” DVD boxed set. He was awarded the National Society of Film Critics “Film Heritage Honor” for his work in film preservation and discoveries, and was the presenter of rare Vitaphone shorts at the 2016 TCM Film Festival. For more information you can visit the Vitaphone Project website or Facebook Group.

And, if you’re interested in exploring some of these newly discovered shorts and rarities, you can pick them up on DVD via amazon:

               

 

Posted in Posts by Ron Hutchinson, Vitaphone View | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments