Ron Hutchinson

Ron Hutchinson

It is with profound sadness that we at Classic Movie Hub share the news of the passing of our friend and colleague, Ron Hutchinson, who lost his battle with cancer this Saturday. Ron was one of our own. As a regular contributor to CMH, Ron provided a wealth of unique expertise in the classic film world. More importantly, Ron was a man of compassion, humanity, integrity, and a true-blue friend. The fact that so few knew he was even sick reflects the type of man he was, as well.

The Vitaphone Project's Ron Hutchinson speaks at TCMFF 2016 90th Anniversary of Vitaphone presentation; photo credit: Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub; (c) Classic Movie HubRon Hutchinson at the 2016 TCM Film Festival in celebration of the 90th Anniversary of Vitaphone

His preservation, restoration and passionate work in the specialized Vitaphone media was so instrumental, it is impossible not to connect the word Vitaphone to the name Ron Hutchinson. As the founder of the Vitaphone Project and as one the world’s premier film historians, Ron’s unique knowledge has been sourced in over 25 books, documentaries for PBS and TCM, commentary for the DVD boxed set “The Jazz Singer,” and he was an extremely popular presenter of rare Vitaphone shorts at the 2016 TCM Film Festival. As a member of the Classic Movie Hub family, each of Ron’s monthly articles were like unearthed treasures. We felt so lucky when he generously shared his detailed knowledge with us because we knew every contribution came from the best expert available.

In addition to his many friends and fans throughout the classic film community, Ron’s loss is deeply felt by his family. Ron Hutchinson proudly spoke of his children and grandchildren often. Our hearts and condolences go out to you all.

–The Classic Movie Hub Family

Posted in Vitaphone View | Tagged , | 2 Comments

The Funny Papers: Patsy Kelly and Thelma Todd, The Slapstick Buddy Duo

The Funny Papers: Patsy Kelly and Thelma Todd, The Slapstick Buddy Duo

Lately, I’ve been binge-watching an Amazon Prime show which has also garnered attention at the Golden Globes, The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel. It’s a hilarious delight that many classic film fans may likely enjoy for its classic 1950s/1960s vibe. The cast delivers top-notch performances, as reflected by Rachel Brosnahan’s (as Mrs. Midge Maisel) 2019 Golden Globe win for Best Performance by an Actress in a Television Series- Musical or Comedy, for a second year. While streaming my latest obsession, I was struck by Maisel’s sidekick’s resemblance to actress Patsy Kelly.

The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel Rachel Brosnahan Alex Borstein“The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel” Rachel Brosnahan’s Mrs. Maisel is inspired by Joan Rivers’ early stand-up days. Alex Borstein as Susie Myerson channels Patsy Kelly, in my humble opinion.

Alex Borstein portrays Mrs. Maisel’s manager, Susie Myerson. Short-statured tomboy Susie and her no-nonsense, wisecracking dry wit provide the complementary balance to perky, pristinely girly Midge. While immensely enjoying the chemistry of this friendship, I noticed the striking on-screen parallels between Susie and the classic character actress Patsy Kelly.

Patsy KellyPatsy Kelly, “Queen of the Wisecracks”

In the 1930s, Patsy Kelly was a popular supporting comic relief on the silver screen. Born to Irish immigrants John and Deila Kelly in Brooklyn, NY on January 12, 1910, this month would have been Patsy’s 109th birthday. Starting at the age of twelve, Patsy was already on the vaudeville stage. Here is where she honed her craft for ad-libbing and comedic timing. Then, the Broadway stage is where she was performing when Hal Roach brought her to Hollywood.

Hal Roach was attempting to create a female Laurel and Hardy duo. He paired beauty Thelma Todd with ZaSu Pitts. In 1933, Pitts left Roach Studios so Roach paired Todd with newcomer Patsy Kelly. From 1933 to 1935, Todd and Kelly made 21 two-reeler comedy shorts.

Thelma Todd and ZaSu Pitts Hal Roach ShortsThelma Todd and ZaSu Pitts partnered in Hal Roach shorts, 1931 – 1933

Born in Lawrence, MA on July 29, 1906, Thelma Todd was a stand-out with a myriad of gifts in beauty, intelligence, acting and a natural instinct for physical comedy. She seemed destined for greatness. Well-educated, Todd planned to teach but her mother devised other plans that focused on her physical attributes via beauty contests. Upon successfully winning several competitions, she was recruited to the silver screen. A versatile asset to the studios, Todd was adept equally in drama and comedy roles, and she transitioned well from the silents to early talkies.

Soon she was signed to Paramount and her acting career flourished in the late 1920s. In romcoms, westerns, and dramas, she worked with co-stars such as Gary Cooper, Richard Dix, Buddy Rogers, and Nancy Carroll. But comedy was her best strength. She excelled in comedy shorts and was notable in comic pairings with Laurel and Hardy and the Marx Brothers (Monkey Business (1931) and Horse Feathers (1932)).

Thelma Todd Zeppo Marx, Harpo Marx Horse Feathers (1932)Thelma Todd with Zeppo and Harpo Marx in Horse Feathers (1932). Todd was the eye-candy version of Margaret Dumont for the Marx Bros. films.
Patsy Kelly and Thelma ToddPatsy Kelly and Thelma Todd became the female Laurel and Hardy team in 21 shorts, 1933 – 1935

Both Todd and Kelly were riding a rocket trajectory in their careers in 1935 when their partnership abruptly ended with Thelma Todd’s death at the mere age of 29 years old. Todd was a smart businesswoman and the nite club she owned was the popular hotspot for Hollywood celebs and tourists alike. When her body was found in her garage, the police rushed to claim her death as a suicide by carbon dioxide. This has been refuted by most, then and now. The prevailing theories center on both her business partner Roland West and Todd’s refusal to yield to the mob’s pressures to turn her club into a front to launder money.

Thelma Todd Sidewalk CafeThelma Todd, savvy business owner, in front of her Sidewalk Cafe

Side note: While in the area for a recent TCM Film Festival, my friends and I visited Thelma’s Sidewalk Café in its beautiful Pacific Palisades location along Pacific Coast Highway in Santa Monica. Gives you goosebumps to see it in person.

Thelma Todd Sidewalk Cafe Original PhotoThelma Todd Sidewalk Cafe TodayThelma Todd’s Sidewalk Cafe, then and now

Separate from Todd’s unexpected death, Kelly’s career soon suffered its own challenges. Kelly was a reliable B-lister for dry wisecracks. But she was also a rare example in the 1930s of someone who was very honest to the press regarding her sexuality. When her career began to tank as a result, her friend/occasional lover Tallulah Bankhead hired her as a personal assistant during the rough years until television eventually allowed her a chance for a comeback, outside of poverty row films. Times changed and she found work not only on TV but in a few films again (i.e. Rosemary’s Baby (1968) and Freaky Friday (1976)). Patsy returned to the Broadway stage, as well. Her final stage performance was alongside Debbie Reynolds in Irene (1973). Her final television gig was on the hit show, “Love Boat” in 1979. After suffering a stroke the year prior, Patsy Kelly died September 24, 1981.

Thelma Todd and Patsy Kelly’s on-screen teaming was not simply two actors who performed together for a time, they were an anomaly then and now. What Hal Roach attempted was a series of an actual female comedy buddy duo concept, where each is essentially equal and they both focus on physical comedy. It would be easy to have fallen for the trap of Todd playing the straight, thanks to her physical beauty, leaving all the slapstick to Kelly. Luckily for us, Roach could see Thelma was much more than a pretty face and possessed that comic instinct. It would additionally have been a convenient stereotype to set up a power imbalance between the two in these Kelly/Todd shorts.

Thelma Todd Cary Grant This is the Night (1932)Thelma Todd with Cary Grant in his first full feature, This is the Night (1932)

Rather, these shorts generally place them as working women who are both struggling to make it, always with hilarious results. Similar to the Laurel and Hardy model, friendship is at the core of the relationship, even in those trying moments that lead to funny mishaps. While there are obvious differences in their appearances, one is not forced to play the child-like, daft or inferior one (that is frequently found in comedy duos). Both are usually on equal terms.

I wondered what other female buddy comedy duos have come along in the same vein as Todd and Kelly. Lucy and Ethel (of the “I Love Lucy” TV series, 1951 – 1957) were/are extremely popular characters and created some of the funniest bits in television’s history. But I always got the impression Lucy always had the upper hand in their balance of power. She was clearly the main center of attention so for me personally, they do not quite fit the bill. Then I thought of more modern-day female comics. In many ways, I see Tina Fey and Amy Poehler as carrying on some of that Todd/Kelly vibe. Kristen Wiig and Maya Rudolph are also hilarious but do not lean into the slapstick side quite as much, although I believe they’re perfect for it. For my money, Melissa McCarthy is the best example of a modern-day instinct for physical comedy. While her ensemble performances are most well-known, she has paired with other female comics in several films that are slapstick gems (i.e. with Miranda Hart and Rose Byrne in Spy (2015), and with Sandra Bullock in The Heat (2013)).

Thelma Todd Patsy KellyThelma Todd and Patsy Kelly creating comedy shorts

While there may be a few examples here and there that come somewhat close, I believe it’s a great loss for all audiences that we have not seen Hollywood attempt to recreate an on-screen female friendship duo that excels in slapstick on par with Thelma Todd and Patsy Kelly.

–Kellee Pratt for Classic Movie Hub

When not performing marketing and social media as her day gig, Kellee Pratt writes for her own classic film blog, Outspoken & Freckled (kelleepratt.com). Kellee teaches classic film courses in her college town in Kansas (Screwball Comedy this Fall). Unapologetic social butterfly, she’s an active tweetaholic/original alum for #TCMParty, member of the CMBA, Social Producer for TCM (2015, 2016), and busy mom of four kids and 3 fur babies. You can follow Kellee on twitter at @IrishJayHawk66

Posted in Posts by Kellee Pratt, The Funny Papers | Tagged , , | 11 Comments

Musical Interlude: Musicals of Hollywood’s Greatest Year

Musical Interlude: Musicals of Hollywood’s Greatest Year

It’s known as Hollywood’s greatest year: 1939.

As we celebrate films released 80 years ago, we think of some of the most obvious film achievements the storied year brought us: Gone with the Wind, The Wizard of Oz, Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, Stagecoach … The list could go on and on and on.

No doubt, these films are great, but let us consider the musicals of 1939. Many of these musicals are good, and though perhaps not of the caliber as those listed above, they hold their own level of importance.

The year 1939 isn’t just magnificent for the films, but also how it shaped or catapulted the film careers of some of the stars, or how it helped change the landscape of film. Here are just a few musicals that did just that:

Babes in Arms (1939) Mickey Rooney and Judy GarlandMickey Rooney and Judy Garland in Babes in Arms (1939).

Babes in Arms (1939)
The children of vaudeville stars want their parents to take them on the road with them. When the parents say no, Mickey (Mickey Rooney) and Betsy (Judy Garland) decide to organize their own show with the help of their friends. While Mickey Rooney and Judy Garland already co-starred in Thoroughbreds Don’t Cry (1937) and Love Finds Andy Hardy (1938) together, Babes in Arms marked their first musical together. Babes in Arms also kicked off the successful “Hey, kids, let’s put on a show” format, which their next films followed, and was director Busby Berkeley’s first full-length directorial project at Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer.

Balalaika (1939) Nelson Eddy Ilona MasseyNelson Eddy and Ilona Massey in Balalaika (1939).

Balalaika (1939)
Set before the Russian Revolution and World War I, Nelson Eddy plays a Russian prince (posing as a commoner) and Ilona Massey is a singer that is also the daughter of a political activist who opposes of the royalty. The two fall in love but their difference and World War I drive them apart. Speaking of separating screen teams, Nelson Eddy made only two films from 1935 to 1945 without Jeanette MacDonald, both in 1939, first another musical Let Freedom Ring, followed by Balalaika. Balalaika was also the first Hollywood film for Hungarian actress and singer, Ilona Massey, who was later built up as a threat to stars like Greer Garson.

Broadway Serenade (1939) Jeanette MacDonald Lew AyresJeanette MacDonald and Lew Ayres in Broadway Serenade (1939).

Broadway Serenade (1939)
Mary and Jimmy (Jeanette MacDonald and Lew Ayres) are a married performing act — Mary sings while Jimmy accompanies her on piano. Mary is noticed by a producer and is asked to audition for a Broadway part. Cast in the show, her role and fame grew as her talent is noticed. On the other side, Jimmy’s music career is stalled and his wife’s success drives them apart.

As you can see, while Nelson Eddy was off performing without Jeanette MacDonald, she was doing the same. In the only film, she released in 1939, MacDonald co-stars with Lew Ayres. However, this wasn’t MacDonald’s first film without Eddy; she performed with other actors from 1935 to 1939.

First Love (1939) Deanna Durbin and Robert SlackDeanna Durbin and Robert Slack in First Love (1939).

First Love (1939)
In a Cinderella-like story, Connie (played by Deanna Durbin) is an orphan whose only relatives don’t care for her and she is brought up by servants. She falls in love with Ted Drake (Robert Stack) and wants to go to a ball with him, and the servants help her. Deanna Durbin started out as a child star, and First Love is a coming-of-age teenage role for her. She even receives her first on-screen kiss in First Love from Robert Stack. The film is also Robert Stack’s first credited film role.

The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle Ginger Rogers and Fred AstaireGinger Rogers and Fred Astaire in The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle (1939).

The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle (1939)
As the title suggests, The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle is a biographical film about married couple Vernon and Irene, played by Fred Astaire and Ginger Rogers, who rise to fame as ballroom dancers. Their happiness and careers are threatened when World War I begins. The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle is different from the 10 other films Astaire and Rogers made together. It is the only biographical film the dancing actors made together and the only one of their films that didn’t have a happy ending.

But what really stands out about The Story of Vernon and Irene Castle is that it’s the last film Astaire and Rogers made together until they reunited again 10 years later in 1949 in The Barkleys of Broadway. The separation allowed both to go in slightly different directions. Astaire continued in musicals, but with different leading ladies and more varied plots. Rogers was able to stretch her acting abilities a bit more — performing in films ranging from comedies to drama.

That's Right – You're Wrong (1939) Kay KyserKay Kyser

That’s Right – You’re Wrong (1939)
Popular bandleader Kay Kyser (as himself) leaves his radio show gig to start a career in films in Hollywood. The trouble is, his wild and jokey persona doesn’t seem to fit any script Hollywood has to offer. This may seem like a really odd pick. However, I find That’s Right – You’re Wrong notable for a reason. This is the first film starring bandleader Kay Kyser and his band, who made nine films from 1939 until 1944. Most popular during the World War II-era, North Carolinian Kyser would don a graduation cap and gown, host a quiz show and perform music with his band. While some songs were straight romantic ballads, others were a bit more whimsical and band members would be engaged in singing or other noises during a performance.

While Kyser himself may not have been important in the grand scheme of musicals, his appearance in musicals marked a departure from the old style of musicals and a new variation. Kyser’s big band music in the films generally didn’t help move along the plot (as in traditional musicals); they generally were band performances. This would go on to be mimicked when other bandleaders like Tommy Dorsey and Harry James began appearing in films — but none of them were the star of the show like Kyser.

Which musical will you celebrate 80 years of 1939 with?

 …

– Jessica Pickens for Classic Movie Hub

Jessica can be found at cometoverhollywood.com and on twitter at @HollywoodComet. In addition to her overall love of classic movies, she has ongoing series on her site including “Watching 1939″ and “Musical Monday.”

Posted in Musical Interlude, Posts by Jessica Pickens | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Silents are Golden: The Good, The Bad, And The Not-So-Bad Of Silent Era Acting

Silents are Golden: The Good, The Bad, And The Not-So-Bad Of Silent Era Acting

So you’re thinking of taking the plunge and exploring the world of silent films! You’re intrigued by those flickery, black and white images from a time gone by, and are looking to expand your film history knowledge–and perhaps add some new favorites to your movie collection. You’re interested in seeing Clara Bow strut her stuff and Harold Lloyd dangle off that clock, and you’ve heard a lot of intriguing things about German Expressionism. But! there’s one thing holding you back–one thing you’re not sure you can handle. That florid silent film acting.

The Bridal Room (1912) King Baggot and Mrs. Allen WalkerIt was basically this, all the time. Right?

Broad gestures, hands clutching hearts, eye-rolling, occasional swooning–surely this is what’s in store for anyone who attempts to watch century-old motion pictures, or so you feel. And thus, you’ve been a little reluctant to explore that alien world of early 20th-century pop culture (and late 19th-century pop culture, if you’re counting the very oldest films).

Yes, there was certainly plenty of overacting in the silent era–but there was also plenty of understated, naturalistic acting. And there were also specific acting styles that we simply find difficult to get used to, being accustomed to decades of realism and all. But a little knowledge of where those long-gone actors were coming from can go a long way in appreciating silent films.

The most important thing to know about the silent era is that screen acting evolved from the dominant styles on the stage. And it evolved very quickly. Acting in, say, short dramas from 1908 are going to look quite different from your basic feature in 1928–or even 1918.

The Quarell (1912) Chester Barnett and Pearl WhiteThis might not fly in 1928. (Still from The Quarrel,  clipped from Universal Weekly, Nov. 23, 1912.)

For decades–scratch that, for centuries, actors had to make sure their gestures were visible to viewers throughout the theater. Thus, their movements and emoting were often exaggerated or otherwise stylized. Heavy makeup was worn for the same reason (as well as to cope with early forms of stage lighting). Many actors and stage directors felt that the theater was supposed to be “larger than life,” providing an escape from ordinary routine–and broad acting was a part of that escape. Sarah Bernhardt, for example, is famous to this day for her mastery of the “grand manner.”

By the late 19th century, there were certain styles of acting that were very influential. One of the biggest was the Delsarte method, created by French music teacher Francois Delsarte, which taught how to show interior emotions through specific gestures and poses right down to the smallest movements. Thus, an actor might slump and put their hand over their face to show despair, stand straight with clenched fists and a furrowed brow to indicate outrage, etc.

Acting Diagram for Delsarte MethodDiagrams of the famed Delsarte method.

The Delsarte method and other, similar methods that emphasized gesture and pantomime were a big part of Victorian melodrama. So once moving pictures began taking off in the 1900s, many early screen actors attempted to do the same type of acting for the camera that they’d always done onstage. The results were…not subtle.

The Power of Destruction (1912)This was actually one of the subtler ones. (The Power of Destruction, clipped from  Moving Picture World, 1912).

What looked swell on a vast stage looked downright silly blown up on a large screen–directors quickly realized more realistic styles of acting were needed. Some actors couldn’t adapt to the new medium, while others evolved through trial and error. By about 1910 theatergoers were insisting on seeing “naturalness” on the screen, and more and more studios were doing their best to comply. A 1911 Moving Picture World critic put it succinctly: “The reason so many photoplays fail utterly in getting across is due to one thing–unnaturalness…motion picture audiences are getting educated. Producers are producing better and better plays and giving more and more attention to details. But they are going to improve more in the next three years than the next ten–or many of them are going out of business…

By the 1910s, subtler acting styles were common on the screen. Some gesturing and posturing was still common too but was used with more care, utilizing the space in the frame to create just the right mise-en-scène. Pause many dramas from about 1908 to the mid-1910s, and the resulting images could almost be paintings. (Ironically, these more refined works are often the types of films people mean when they talk about silent era “overacting,” but it’s simply because they aren’t used to the mannerisms.)

The Sealed Room (1909)The Sealed Room (1909).
The Female of the Species (1912)The Female of the Species (1912).
Les Vampires (1916)Les Vampires (1916).

Once the 1920s rolled around, of course, naturalistic acting was pretty much the norm. There were exceptions, particularly for stylized films like The Last Laugh or Metropolis, which had Expressionistic settings and grand themes that called for highly operatic acting. And silent comedy, of course, retained much of broad grimacing, slapstick, and exaggerated makeup that was popular in the circus and vaudeville. But even that unpretentious genre evolved throughout the silent era. By the 1920s, audiences were growing tired of nonsensical pratfalling and wanted more logic. As a result, many of the top screen clowns began trading baggy pants and thick eyeliner for tailored suits and jaunty hats.

Harold Lloyd Before and AfterHarold Lloyd, Before (the 1910s) and After (1920s).

So as we can see from this (very quick) overview, silent film acting is nothing to be squeamish about, and can even teach us a little about Victorian and Edwardian theater. You can certainly find bad, overdone performances if you look for them, but there are countless fine examples of realism too, from early Biograph shorts like The Musketeers of Pig Alley (1912) to skillful family dramas like Master of the House (1925) to artistic pictures like The Crowd (1928), to name just three. And as far as I’m concerned, much of that stylized acting is worth checking out, too–because in this 21st century, it’s certainly not something you see every day.

–Lea Stans for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Lea’s Silents are Golden articles here.

Lea Stans is a born-and-raised Minnesotan with a degree in English and an obsessive interest in the silent film era (which she largely blames on Buster Keaton). In addition to blogging about her passion at her site Silent-ology, she is a columnist for the Silent Film Quarterly and has also written for The Keaton Chronicle.

Posted in Posts by Lea Stans, Silents are Golden | Tagged , | 3 Comments

Western Roundup: Canyon Passage and The Autry

Western Roundup: Canyon Passage and The Autry

Canyon Passage (1946) Movie PosterCanyon Passage (1946) Movie Poster

Classic film fans in Southern California are fortunate to have a wide variety of opportunities to see classic films, including Westerns, on a big screen.

I recently had the chance to see a 35mm screening of the wonderful Western Canyon Passage (1946) at The Autry Museum of the American West.

As I mentioned here in my Christmas column, the museum was founded by Gene Autry in 1988. Along with his co-founders, his wife Jackie and Mr. and Mrs. Monte Hale, Gene built a museum to “exhibit and interpret the heritage of the West and show how it influenced America and the world.” The museum is also “dedicated to exploring an inclusive history of the American West,” including the histories of Indians and other minorities.

Autry Museum EntranceAutry Museum of the American West in Los Angeles, California

The museum houses over 600,000 artifacts and archival materials. As part of chronicling myriad aspects of the Western experience, the museum devotes considerable space and resources to Western films — no surprise, given the career histories of cofounders Autry and Hale! More on the museum will follow later in this column.

The museum has an ongoing film series, “What is a Western?” which is dedicated to exploring Westerns “and the ways in which they shape our understanding of the American West.” Canyon Passage was shown as part of this series, preceded by a very informative introduction by film historian Jeremy Arnold.

Autry Museum Jeremy Arnold Film HistorianFilm Historian, Jeremy Arnold

Jeremy shared the information that the film was based on a novel by Ernest Haycox, who also wrote the story which inspired Stagecoach (1939). The film Canyon Passage was originally envisioned to serve as a reunion for Stagecoach stars John Wayne, Claire Trevor, and Thomas Mitchell.

I agree with Jeremy that as marvelous as those actors are, their presence would have made Canyon Passage an entirely different film, and I’m glad that producer Walter Wanger ultimately cast Dana Andrews, Susan Hayward, and Brian Donlevy. (I do agree with a suggestion I read that Robert Preston would have been ideal alternate casting for Donlevy’s role, though Donlevy is excellent.)

Canyonn Passage (1946) Brian Donlevy and Susan HaywardBrian Donlevy and Susan Hayward in Canyon Passage (1946)

Director Jacques Tourneur had made a name for himself with low-budget RKO thrillers such as Cat People (1942) and I Walked with a Zombie (1944), and his most recent film was the Gothic romantic mystery Experiment Perilous. With Canyon Passage, Tourneur had the opportunities of a big budget and extensive location filming in Oregon, and he made the most of it.

As Jeremy noted, part of the film’s uniqueness is its very green outdoor setting, filmed by Edward Cronjager at sites including Oregon’s Diamond Lake and Crater Lake. There have been relatively few films made in Oregon, especially as of the mid-’40s, and with so much of the film’s running time shot outdoors, it gives the movie a fresh and authentically Western feel in its depiction of a frontier town in 1856.

When I first saw the film about 15 years ago, I was a bit confused by its loose plotting; indeed, Jeremy challenged viewers to be able to tell him the plot after the movie! I now see the storytelling style as quite modern, using the “elliptical” methods of a program like Mad Men which doesn’t show everything, only certain high points, and flits from character to character, with some key moments taking place offscreen. Although Logan (Andrews) and Lucy (Hayward) are front and center, Canyon Passage is truly the story of an entire frontier community.

 Canyon Passage (1946) Dana Andrews and Susan HaywardDana Andrews and Susan Hayward Canyon Passage (1946).

Andrews’ character is a merchant who runs a pack mule service to his remote Oregon town. He becomes better acquainted with Hayward’s Lucy, who’s engaged to his friend George (Donlevy), when he escorts her home from Portland.

There is clearly an attraction between Logan and Lucy, yet Lucy remains loyal to George and Logan eventually proposes to Caroline (Patricia Roc), an orphaned young woman who lives with his friends the Dances (Andy Devine and Dorothy Peterson). Caroline’s acceptance of Logan’s proposal disappoints Vane (Victor Cutler), a young man who works for Logan who also loves Caroline.

Canyon Passage (1946) Patricia RocPatricia Roc in Canyon Passage (1946).

The plot, such as it is, is about the characters’ relationships and challenges, whether it’s gradually changing romantic alliances, George (Donlevy) and his gambling addiction, Logan dealing with a bully (Ward Bond, unforgettably evil), or an Indian uprising; we see the community at its best and worst, whether it’s the quick “frontier justice” trial of an accused murderer or the townspeople coming together to build a cabin for newlyweds.

The maturity and kindness of most of the characters in their personal relationships is striking; Lucy and Logan remain committed to George and Caroline until freed by circumstances, and Logan unhesitatingly gives George $2000 to clear up his gambling debts before marrying Lucy. (Sadly, George’s addiction is such that he cannot take advantage of the chance at a fresh start.) The self-possessed Lucy may enjoy kissing Logan, at George’s instigation, but she’s no flirt. The respectful way the lead characters treat one another stands in stark contrast to the bullying of Honey Bragg (Bond), and one of the film’s tragedies is the way George slowly slips into emulating Bragg’s evil behavior himself.

In my thinking, a great film reveals more to the viewer each time it’s seen. It’s been clear to me on previous viewings that George has innate laziness, along with the torments of addiction, but this time I was particularly struck by the way he exists outside the community. During the house raising he’s finely dressed, sitting under a tree with Lucy; it’s not simply that he won’t get his hands dirty with hard work, but emotionally he doesn’t feel connected to the others or desire to help them, as he already has one foot “out the door” of the town.

Canyon Passage (1946) Foreign Movie PosterForeign Movie Poster for Canyon Passage (1946).

I also particularly loved the scene where Logan and Vane find Caroline wandering in the forest after the Indian attack. The way Vane says “Caroline,” with relief, love, and longing in his voice, really affected me — as it does Caroline in the film. She looks at Vane and, despite her trauma-induced confusion, seems to see him clearly for the first time; indeed, Vane’s gentleness seems to help snap her back to reality.

Given the lack of ardor in Logan’s original proposal to Caroline, asking if she likes him enough to marry him, it was fitting that she politely released him from his obligation in favor of Vane. Not only would this give Caroline her goal of a permanent home, but she would also have a man who truly loved her; Logan, meanwhile, is clearly better matched with the more adventurous Lucy, who is willing to spend days on the trail and can support Logan’s need to travel as he builds his business. As Logan leaves the homestead, in the distance we see him shaking Vane’s hand, giving him his blessing, and we know that all will be well for both couples.

One of the joys of a film of this era is the cast; besides those actors already named, the town is filled with great faces like Hoagy Carmichael, Lloyd Bridges, Fay Holden, Stanley Ridges, and Halliwell Hobbes. Carmichael plays a key role as a sort of roving minstrel and town spy/gossip; he co-wrote the Oscar-nominated “Ole Buttermilk Sky” for this film.

Canyon Passage (1946) Ole Buttermilk SkyOle buttermilk sky – I’m a-keeping my eye peeled on you – What’s the good word tonight – Are you gonna be mellow tonight?

The many talented people who made this film combined efforts to provide a richly rewarding viewing experience, and as the final notes of “Ole Buttermilk Sky” fade away, the viewer is both sad to part ways with the characters yet very glad to have spent time in their company.

I hope to return to the Autry for future Western screenings, starting with Budd Boetticher’s The Tall T (1957) in a few weeks.

As described at the top of this post, the Autry has exhibits on many facets of the Western experience, including “real” and “reel.” The museum houses an impressive collection of Western art, with cinema and art history coming together in the fact that there is a gallery named for Western actor and artist George Montgomery:

The Autry Museum Montgomery GalleryThe George Montgomery Gallery at Autry Museum

A peek at some of the movie Western memorabilia in the museum includes guns owned by (top to bottom) Ken Maynard, Buck Jones, and Leo Carrillo:

Autry Museum - Ken Maynard, Buck Jones, Leo Carillo - GunsKen Maynard, Buck Jones and Leo Carrillo’s movie memorabilia guns on display

Carrillo, besides being well known for playing Pancho in the TV Western The Cisco Kid, was also a significant figure in “real” California history; he was a preservationist who served on the State Beach and Parks Commission for years and played a key role in the state taking over Hearst Castle. Today his ranch is a museum, and a state park and an elementary school are named in his honor.

Guns owned (top to bottom) by Gail Davis, Tim Holt, and Gene Autry:

Autry Museum Gail Davis, Tim Holt, Gene Autry Movie gunsGail Davis, Tim Holt, Gene Autry’s movie memorabilia guns on display

The museum also has a gun owned by Wyatt Earp, who was the subject of my December column:

Autry Museum Wyatt Earp GunWyatt Earp’s gun #18

I’m particularly a fan of Buck Jones, who died tragically in the 1942 Cocoanut Grove fire in Boston, so it was quite special to see his saddle:

Aurty Museum Buck Jones SaddleBuck Jones’ saddle hanging in the Autry Museum

A section on singing cowboys includes this ukelele donated by Dick Foran‘s son:

Autry Museum Dick Foran UkeleleDick Foran’s Ukelele in the Autry Museum

The museum has many other film-related treasures, including costumes worn by John Wayne and Alan Ladd, Indian costumes donated by Iron Eyes Cody, a Norman Rockwell painting of Gary Cooper, and Western gear worn by Charles Starrett, Johnny Mack Brown, Hoot Gibson, Russell Hayden, and more.

I encourage my fellow Western fans who have the opportunity to go to Griffith Park in Los Angeles and pay a visit to The Autry!

 …

– Laura Grieve for Classic Movie Hub

Laura can be found at her blog, Laura’s Miscellaneous Musings, where she’s been writing about movies since 2005, and on Twitter at @LaurasMiscMovie. A lifelong film fan, Laura loves the classics including Disney, Film Noir, Musicals, and Westerns.  She regularly covers Southern California classic film festivals.  Laura will scribe on all things western at the ‘Western RoundUp’ for CMH.

Posted in Museums, Posts by Laura Grieve, Western RoundUp | Tagged , , | 12 Comments

Vitaphone View: The View from the Vitaphone Projection Booth

Vitaphone View: The View from the Vitaphone Projection Booth

The life of the early Vitaphone projectionist was a tough one. Although well compensated at an average $150/week (about $2158 in 2018 dollars), it was not an easy job. In the silent days, there was normally just one projectionist and no worries about disks, adjusting sound during the film, loss of synchronization and then dealing with it promptly, or a myriad of other issues.

Vitaphone Projector Parts
Parts of a Vitaphone sound-on disk projector

While the talkie projectionists’ job was a little easier with the sound-on-film Fox Movietone system (no disks), we must remember that most theatres were equipped to show sound films in both disk and optical systems. So while the man in the booth might get a brief respite when a Movietone feature was playing, the next one might be from Warner Brothers or First National, and with disks to deal with.

We must remember that until 1930, the sound quality of Vitaphone disks was significantly superior to sound on film. All the major studios issued their features in both formats in order to accommodate as many theatres as possible. Early on, it became obvious that at least temporarily, there needed to be both a projectionist and an assistant in the booth to handle all the duties and ensure a smooth and crisis-free program. Consider all the early talkie projectionist had to do….

Vitaphone Projector Cuing up Disk
Vitaphone projection booth and cue-ing up a disk.

• Soundtrack disks, in duplicate, were shipped to the theatre in advance of the program. These were shipped in heavy wooden boxes along with the 35mm nitrate picture element. Duplicate disks were shipped both in case there was any breakage as well as if additional screenings went beyond the 20 (or 40) recommended plays of each disk. Disks for each reel were carefully placed in a steel storage cabinet designed for that purpose (see photo). Keep in mind that if a program consisted of a feature, a two-reel short, a cartoon and or travelogue a newsreel, and trailers for coming attractions, a single shipment might include 32 or more disks including the duplicates. It was expected that all disks would be returned to the local film exchange immediately after the play date was over. Otherwise, a $3.00 per disk change was supposed to be assessed. It is unclear if those penalties were ever actually enforced, and – fortunately for film preservation – many were not and survive today.

Vitaphone Disk Storage Cabinet Loews New Jersey
A steel Vitaphone disk storage cabinet, this one in the booth of the Loews Jersey booth.
Note there are enough slots to accommodate about forty different disks.

• In the Vitaphone disk system, there were at least two projectors. If you look at some of the accompanying photos of the booth and projectors set-up, imagine that one projector has the picture and disk for Reel 1 of a feature ready to go. The other projector is set-up for Reel 2. As soon as the first projector has completed showing Reel 1 and the projectionist has switched over to Reel 2, then the first projector must be cued-up for Reel 3. This process would continue throughout the entire program. The 16” disks were pressed such that two-sided disks had alternate reels, for example, 1 & 3, then 2 & 4. A one-reel short had just one single-sided disk while a two-reeler required two disks, one with reel 1 and the other for the other projector with reel 2. It is around this time that studios began printing changeover marks at the end for each reel.

• The projectionist and his assistant were not idle once the projector was cued-up and running. Most features came with detailed instructions on how to adjust volume and the fader (front & back sound) DURING each reel. It was highly recommended by the studio that the projectionist rehearse the adjustments in a trial run prior to the first screening. An example of why this time-consuming practice was needed can be seen in MGM’s instructions on The Rogue Song (’30). The booth personnel had to ride herd over the entire soundtrack and make adjustments. MGM warned: “ The desired volume during certain parts is considerably louder than has ever been considered conventional.” For most early talkies, any on-screen gunshot required a prompt lowering of the volume to avoid alarming the audience or harming the Western Electric equipment.

Paramount Vitaphone Disk Needles Projector
A packet of Paramount needles for use on Vitaphone projectors.

• Ensuring synchronization, of course, was essential. Contrary to Singin’ in the Rain, problems with keeping Vitaphone disks in synch with the picture were relatively uncommon. However, it did happen. The Western Electric manual gave guidance on how to handle problems. If the film broke, the disk, of course, continued to play. Immediate shutdown of that projector was advised, with fast splicing and re-threading of the film. Fully aware the rest of the reel would be out of synch, the guidance directed just living with it until the end of the reel. For shorts, no attempt was to be made to address the issue. Just switch to the next reel was the advice. Under normal circumstances, the projectionist placed the needle at the precise starting spot, marked by an arrow in the disks’ area around the label then placed the precise single starting frame in the projector gate. As one motor drove both the turntable and the film, all would stay in sync.

Cuing a Vitaphone Disk
Projectionist cue-ing up a Vitaphone disk by carefully placing the needle at the precise starting spot noted in the disk shellac with an arrow.

The Vitaphone disk system deficiencies were inherent in the system of synchronization, so sloppy presentation could yield disastrous results. A Chicago reporter in 1929, viewing The Broadway Melody noted that “the reproduction was fairly passable until the final reel began, when the synchronization suddenly went bad, the spoken words being several seconds behind the lip movement on the screen.” The audience began clapping, and the projectionist stopped the show, rewinding the reel and starting over, “repeating action we had seen before. A girl behind me giggled and said — referring to the entry of Charles King into a room, ‘ I guess he went out and came back in again! After fifteen seconds, it was obvious the synchronization was off again, the picture was stopped, and shortly thereafter, begun for the third time.”

Australian Vitaphone Disk Projection Booth
An Australian projection booth, equipped for Vitaphone.

Unionization through IATSE expanded during the transition to sound. Because Vitaphone projectionists were in such tight supply and so essential, to theatre operation, their demands for higher pay, and one or even two assistants were readily met. Once the industry moved away from disks and the Depression deepened, the assistants disappeared and the pay scale ratcheted down.

The gravy train, with sound, was over.

Vitaphone Projector in Loews New Jersey
Actual Vitaphone projector, in the booth of the Loews Jersey theatre.

– Ron Hutchinson, Founder of The Vitaphone Project, for Classic Movie Hub

You can read all of Ron’s Vitaphone View articles here.

Ron is widely recognized as one of the country’s foremost film historians, with special emphasis on the period covering the transition to sound (1925-30) and early attempts to add sound to film. As the founder of The Vitaphone Project, he has worked with Warner Brothers, UCLA, LOC and private collectors worldwide to find previously lost soundtrack discs and restore early sound shorts. Ron’s unique knowledge has  been sourced in over 25 books as well as documentaries for PBS and TCM, and commentary for “The Jazz Singer” DVD boxed set. He was awarded the National Society of Film Critics “Film Heritage Honor” for his work in film preservation and discoveries, and was the presenter of rare Vitaphone shorts at the 2016 TCM Film Festival. For more information you can visit the Vitaphone Project website or Facebook Group.

And, if you’re interested in exploring some of these newly discovered shorts and rarities, you can pick them up on DVD via amazon:

               

 

 

Posted in Posts by Ron Hutchinson, Vitaphone View | 2 Comments

Win Tickets to see “TCM Big Screen Classics: My Fair Lady” (Giveaway runs now through Feb 2)

Win tickets to see “My Fair Lady” on the Big Screen!
In Select Cinemas Nationwide
Sun Feb 17 and Wed Feb 20

“Aowh, wouldn’t it be lover-ly.”

CMH continues with our 4th year of our partnership with Fathom Events – with the 2nd of our 14 movie ticket giveaways for 2019, courtesy of Fathom Events! 

That said, we’ll be giving away EIGHT PAIRS of tickets to see “TCM Big Screen Classics: My Fair Lady – starring Audrey Hepburn and Rex Harrison — the way it was meant to be seen – on the Big Screen!

In order to qualify to win a pair of movie tickets via this contest, you must complete the below entry task by Saturday, February 2 at 6pm EST.

We will announce the winner(s) on Twitter on Sunday, February 3between 6PM EST and 7PM EST. If a winner(s) does not have a Twitter account, we will announce that winner(s) via this blog in the comment section below.

my fair lady fathom events

The film will be playing in select cinemas nationwide for a special three-day-only event on Sunday, February 17, and Wednesday, February 20 at 2:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m local time. Winners will be responsible for their own transportation to the Event. Only United States entries are eligible. Please click here before you enter to ensure that the Event is scheduled at a theater near you and that you are able to attend. (please note that there might be slightly different theater listings and/or screening times for each date)

ENTRY TASK (2-parts) to be completed by Saturday February at 6pm EST…

1) Answer the below question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog post

THE QUESTION:
What is it about “My Fair Lady” that makes it a classic — even today, 55 years after its release? And, if you haven’t seen it, why do you want to see it on the Big Screen?

2) Then TWEET* (not DM) the following message:
I just entered to win tickets to see “TCM Big Screen Classics Presents: My Fair Lady” on the Big Screen courtesy of @ClassicMovieHub & @FathomEvents – You can #EnterToWin here: http://ow.ly/Wulg30noQwB

*If you don’t have a Twitter account, you can still enter the contest by simply answering the above question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog — BUT PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU ADD THIS VERBIAGE TO YOUR ANSWER: I do not have a Twitter account, so I am posting here to enter but cannot tweet the message.

NOTE: if for any reason you encounter a problem commenting here on this blog, please feel free to tweet or DM us, or send an email to clas@gmail.com and we will be happy to create the entry for you.

ALSO: Please allow us 48 hours to approve your comments. Sorry about that, but we are being overwhelmed with spam, and must sort through 100s of comments…

my fair lady audrey hepburn

About the film: My Fair Lady is now more “loverly” than ever as a result of its 50th Anniversary, this eight-time OSCAR winning musical (including Best Picture, Best Director & Best Actor) has been restored frame-by-frame from the original 65mm negative and scanned utilizing state-of-the-art technology under the supervision of famed film historian Robert Harris. Audrey Hepburn has never looked more radiant as Eliza Doolittle who finds herself at the center of a friendly wager between Professor Henry Higgins (Rex Harrison) and his companion, Colonel Pickering (Wilfred Hyde-White). Can this disheveled, cockney flower girl find her voice and blossom into a proper lady presentable in high society? Performance, style and sweet spirit… plus an unforgettable score… have made My Fair Lady one of the greatest musicals in film history and a beloved and timeless classic that begs to be experienced on the big screen! This special two-day event includes exclusive insight from Turner Classic Movies.

Please note that only United States residents are eligible to enter this giveaway contest. (see contest rules for further information)

BlogHub members ARE also eligible to win if they live within the Continental United States (as noted above).

Good Luck!

…..

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Contests & Giveaways, Fathom Events, Posts by Annmarie Gatti | Tagged | 38 Comments

Announcement: Fay Wray and Robert Riskin, The Blogathon

Fay Wray and Robert Riskin, The Blogathon

February 26, 2019 marks the release of a must-read dual Hollywood biography and we are honoring it with a special blogathon. Commemorating the lives and careers of one of classic Hollywood’s greatest stars and one of its most memorable screenwriters, Fay Wray and Robert Riskin: A Hollywood Memoir promises an enlightening recounting of a romantic, historical encounter. Written by the couple’s daughter, Victoria Riskin, the memoir tells the tales of Wray’s and Riskin’s work, their fairytale marriage, and an essential story of Hollywood.

fay wray robert riskin a hollywood memoir by victoria riskin

To celebrate the release of Fay Wray and Robert Riskin: A Hollywood Memoir, I have joined forces with Once Upon a Screen for this blogathon event scheduled for the week of the book’s release. You will have no problem choosing a movie or topic. Fay Wray starred in over 120 pictures and opposite Hollywood’s biggest stars – and I don’t mean just a big ape.

Robert Riskin was an Academy Award winning writer with five nominations, a producer, and enjoyed legendary collaborations most notably with Frank Capra with whom he made ten pictures. Riskin’s credits include such notables as It Happened One Night (1934), Lost Horizon (1937), and You Can’t Take It With You (1938).Take a look at a list of Robert Riskin’s cinema accomplishments here.

Now to the fun part. On Saturday, March 2 and on Sunday, March 3 you can submit your entries on either Fay Wray’s or Robert Riskin’s filmographies. One of each would be fun too. Aurora of Once Upon a Screen and I will take turns hosting and promoting your entries across social media. For your efforts, you will be entered to win one of two signed copies of Fay Wray and Robert Riskin: A Hollywood Memoir. From what I hear, Victoria Riskin may well be visiting the entries that weekend. This will be fun! We hope you join us.

Blogathon Details

Let Once Upon a Screen or myself know which movie/topic you are interested in blogging about. The best way to do that is to leave a comment on either announcement post. Since Fay Wray and Robert Riskin had such impressive careers, we will not accept duplicates. A few more reminders are…

  • Include the title and link to your blog in the comments area
  • Advise if you have a date preference – Saturday, March 2 or Sunday, March 3
  • Include the event banner on your blog and in the entry post to help us promote the event.
  • Spread the word. Help us make this a resounding success!

Auora and I look forward to hearing from you and to reading your entries.

fay wray and robert riskin blogathon

…..

Link to Day One Posts at Once Upon a Screen

Link to Day Two Posts at Classic Movie Hub

and…

Participating Blogs and Chosen Topics:

Love Letters to Old Hollywood – Small Town Girl (1953)

Love Letters to Old Hollywood – Magic Town (1947)

Carole and Co. – Robert Riskin and Virtue (1932)

Carole and Co. – The Wedding March (1928)

The Hitless Wonder – The Mystery of the Wax Museum (1933)

Silver Screenings – The Clairvoyant (1935)

Caftan Woman – The Careers of Riskin and Wray in 1934 with focus on Broadway Bill and Black Moon

Movie Movie Blog Blog II – King Kong and It Happened One Night Double Feature

In the Good Old Days of Classic Hollywood – The Cobweb (1955)

Phyllis Loves Classic Movies – The Richest Girl in the World (1934)

The Story Enthusiast – Platinum Blonde (1931)

The Stop Button – It Happened in Hollywood (1937)

Classic Film Journal – Lost Horizon (1937)

Classic Film Journal – Doxtor X (1932)

Watching Forever – Mr. Deeds Goes to Town (1936)

Critica Retro – Capra-Riskin Partnership

Sister Celluloid – The Miracle Woman (1931)

Once Upon a Screen – The Most Dangerous Game (1932)

Once Upon a Screen – The Thin Man Goes Home (1944)

Classic Movie Hub — Exclusive Interview with Victoria Riskin (daughter of Fay Wray and Robert Riskin)

…..

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Blogathons | Tagged , , , | 18 Comments

Stuntwomen: The Untold Hollywood Story – Book Giveaway (Facebook/Blog Nov/Dec)

Stuntwomen: The Untold Hollywood Story
Book Giveaway via Facebook and this Blog

Okay, now it’s time for the Facebook/Blog version of our Stuntwomen: The Untold Hollywood Story Giveaway Contest! This time we’ll be giving away one copy of the book via Facebook and this blog, courtesy of University Press of Kentucky. And, remember, we’re also giving away FIVE MORE copies via Twitter this month as well, so please feel free to enter that contest too…

In order to qualify to win this prize via this Facebook/Blog contest giveaway, you must complete the below entry task by Saturday, Feb 2 at 9PM ESTWe will pick one winner via a random drawing and announce him/her on Facebook and here on this Blog the day after the contest ends (Sunday Feb 3).

If you’re also on Twitter, please feel free to visit us at  @ClassicMovieHub for additional giveaways — because we’ll be giving away FIVE MORE books there as well! PS: you don’t even need a twitter account to enter! (Click here for twitter contest details as well as more information about the book.)

stuntwomen the untold hollywood storyFeaturing 65 interviews, Stuntwomen showcases the absorbing stories and uncommon courage of women who make their living planning and performing action-packed sequences that keep viewers’ hearts racing.

…..

ENTRY TASK to be completed by Saturday, Feb 2 at 9PM EST —

1) Answer the below question via the comment section at the bottom of this blog post

THE QUESTION:
What is it that intrigues you about the the history of classic movies?

NOTE: if for any reason you encounter a problem commenting here on this blog, please feel free to tweet or DM us, or send an email to clas@gmail.com and we will be happy to create the entry for you.

ALSO: Please allow us 48 hours to approve your comments. Sorry about that, but we are being overwhelmed with spam, and must sort through 100s of comments…

About the Book: They’ve traded punches in knockdown brawls, crashed biplanes through barns, and raced to the rescue in fast cars. They add suspense and drama to the story, portraying the swimmer stalked by the menacing shark, the heroine dangling twenty feet below a soaring hot air balloon, or the woman leaping nine feet over a wall to escape a dog attack. Only an expert can make such feats of daring look easy, and stuntwomen with the skills to perform―and survive―great moments of action in movies have been hitting their mark in Hollywood since the beginning of film. Here, Mollie Gregory presents the first history of stuntwomen in the film industry from the silent era to the twenty-first century. In the early years of motion pictures, women were highly involved in all aspects of film production, but they were marginalized as movies became popular, and more important, profitable. Capable stuntwomen were replaced by men in wigs, and very few worked between the 1930s and 1960s. As late as the 1990s, men wore wigs and women’s clothes to double as actresses, and were even “painted down” for some performances, while men and women of color were regularly denied stunt work. For decades, stuntwomen have faced institutional discrimination, unequal pay, and sexual harassment even as they jumped from speeding trains and raced horse-drawn carriages away from burning buildings. Featuring sixty-five interviews, Stuntwomen showcases the absorbing stories and uncommon courage of women who make their living planning and performing action-packed sequences that keep viewers’ hearts racing.

…..

Click here for the full contest rules. 

Please note that only Continental United States (excluding Alaska, Hawaii, and the territory of Puerto Rico) entrants are eligible.

And — BlogHub members ARE eligible to win if they live within the Continental United States (as noted above).

Good Luck!

And if you can’t wait to win the book, you can purchase the on amazon by clicking here:

…..

–Annmarie Gatti for Classic Movie Hub

Posted in Contests & Giveaways, Posts by Annmarie Gatti | Tagged , | 8 Comments

Pre-Code Corner: Baby Face (1933) – Ten Steps to Perfectly Pre-Code

Pre-Code Corner: Baby Face (1933)
Ten Steps to Perfectly Pre-Code

In the era of Pre-Codes, there are a few films that stand out. When I think of Pre-Code films, sometimes it’s the violent nature, or perhaps a few nods to bathtub gin with women barely clad in lingerie, casually checking their stocking hems. (They seem to be forever in a state of getting dressed.) The good ones sparkle with sexual innuendos and are shockingly thumbing their noses at Breen. Of these truly oh-so-naughty-they’re-good Pre-Codes, Alfred E Green’s Baby Face (1933) is my favorite.

Barbara Stanwyck as Lily Powers is unforgettable in this role. Lily was educated into the school of hard knocks from a young age which molded her into a hardened survivor. With no loving network, her only supporters are her friend Cragg (Alphonse Ethier), who advises her to flip the script by exploiting herself and to use her sexual prowess as power over men, and Chico (Theresa Harris) as her constant companion/maid.

Here are my 10 examples of why Baby Face (1933) is perfectly Pre-Code. Like Lily’s floor-by-floor transformation, consider each of these steps parallel to her ambitious climb. Be forewarned that spoiler alerts lurk ahead. But be rest assured that if you have not watched this film prior, this list shouldn’t spoil your future screening. It’s simply too good not to share.

Baby Face (1933) Barbara Stanwyck Coffee “Oh, excuse me, my hand shakes so when I’m around you.”

“Nothing but men, dirty rotten men”
Pre-Codes are engineered to be shocking in their embrace of the gritty side of life. But the grittiest view of Lily’s life is our introduction to her coal-choked birthplace. Her dingy existence in her childhood home is more than just metaphorically filthy as we watch Lily water plants in a window box. She brushes off a thick layer of coal dust from the blackened plants as dark smoke is belched out from the smokestacks in her view. Lily’s mother is gone – it’s suggested that she’s been dead for many years. And Lily’s father (Robert Barrat as Nick Powers) has been acting more like her pimp from the time Lily was fourteen years old than a parent (or even a decent human being). Unlike the harsh transparencies of a modern film, we are spared from anything directly graphic and visual. But the suggestive dialogue and interactions provide our imaginations with plenty.

Lily’s father has turned their home into a speakeasy for all the factory workers to grab a Prohibition-era beer after their shifts. To grease the palms of dirty cops and politicians while openly operating an illegal bar, Lily is barkeep while additionally offered up as protection payment.

Baby Face (1933) Barbara Stanwyck and Theresa HarrisChico: “Hey, he’s a big politician, ain’t he?
Lily: “He’s a big something and it ain’t a politician.
 Baby Face (1933) Barbara Stanwyck Nat PendletonDid You Know: Baby Face was originally banned in some US cities due to its sexual innuendo.

“Why don’t we sit down and talk this thing over?”
En route to a Nietzsche-empowered life by sexually exploiting men, Chico and Lily train-hop to the big city. The rail worker attempts to throw them in jail for a month when Lily takes her first conquest. There’s a shot of Stanwyck’s Cheshire cat smile, as Harris hums “St. Louis Blues” and saunters to the corner. We see a closeup of his gloves dropped next to the lantern and he dims the lantern until darkness.

Apparently, this lantern dimming scene was one of the scenes that gave censors fright and was trimmed – along with other deemed provocative scenes – before its wide release in 1933 and not seen again publicly until 2004. It can be tough to watch such scenes because you know this cycle of prostitution, even as she believes she is finally making choices to better her future, is essentially the same continuation as her dark life before. But as she and Chico arrive in the big city hungry, and as women draped in furs walk by, Lily is determined.

“Have you had any experience?’
When Lily sets her aim for a tall bank building to seek a job, her seductive strategy begins immediately with a portly Mr. Pratt (Maynard Holmes). When he asks her if she has any experience, her dry delivery of “plenty” is perfection. We hear Stanwyck snap back in this exact deadpan tone, with this same double-entendre meaning in other scenes. It’s the perfect touch of Pre-Code sass mixed with Depression-era toughness.

Climbing the career ladder.
The direct path of Lily Powers’ ambitious and swift ascent to success and fortune, is visually displayed for the audience right up to the Gotham Bank Co. building. Every time she looks flirtatiously at a supervisor in that particular department, we next see the camera pan up the side of the building to another floor of greater corporate status. Personnel- Filing- Mortgage Dept.- Accounting….

I am tickled to see Jimmy McCoy Jr. portrayed by a young Marion Robert Morrison (aka John Wayne). McCoy is the one we first hear nickname her “Baby Face.” When co-workers witness Lily making a chump out of McCoy, as she has already moved on to his boss as her next conquest, a female staff wryly heeds warning:

“You don’t know you’re out until they stop counting. Wake up, kid. Baby Face is moving out of your class.”

Ironically, between Jimmy and Lily, he’s the true ‘baby face’ of the two.

Baby Face (1933) John Wayne and Barbara StanwyckJohn Wayne at a ‘baby-faced’ 25 years old!

Rendezvous in the Ladies Room.
I am especially fond of the camera angles and framing in a scene when Lily is caught re-applying her lipstick after a tryst in the ladies room with a boss named Mr. Brody (Douglass Dumbrille). They are caught by Mr. Stevens (Donald Cook), who immediately terminates Brody and walks right into Lily’s spider web. By now, Lily is hunting for big game with her higher-end dresses and platinum permanent wave.

 Baby Face (1933) George Brent Barbara StanwyckDonald Cook and Barbara Stanwyck embrace

“Are you letting me go?”
When Lily is caught in an embrace with Stevens by his fiancée, Henry Kolker as Mr. Carter (his boss/the fiancee’s father) attempts to be firm in terminating Lily. But, as you can imagine by her track record, both Stevens and Carter are taken in by Lily’s siren call. Carter is a 1st VP at the bank. Instead of dismissing her, Carter spends the night at her luxury apartment. That’s right – the same woman who is having an affair with his daughter’s fiancé. As an audience, we see this overnight visit visually play-out as Carter is greeted by Chico (who now wears an upper-class maid’s uniform). The entrance to Lily’s apartment is lit for the evening. We then see Carter hurriedly exit, with that tell-tale ‘walk of shame’ expression and gate, through that same entryway now with daylight lighting. As he approaches the elevator, he passes a cleaning woman who greets, “good morning.” The censors must have raised eyebrows on that clip.

Baby Face (1933) Barbara Stanwyck Chico Theresa HarrisBarbara Stanwyck and Theresa Harris (Chico)

Remaining loyal to Chico.
When Carter overhears Chico singing “St. Louis Blues” in the background, he asks Lily, “I wish you would get rid of that fantastic colored woman.” Lily stands firm, “NO. she stays.” He asks if she wants a baby grand piano. She declines again. He asks if somebody at her home played the piano. “Yeah, anybody who had a nickel,” she snaps sourly in her dry tone revealing pains of her secret past life. When he is taken aback, she immediately flips back into her smiling, baby-talk.

It’s not easy to fully understand through our modern-day lens in examining the relationship between Lily and Chico. Although she works as her maid, we see signs of loyalty and respect to Chico from Lily that audiences simply didn’t come across on-screen in the early 1930s. Lily started trusting no one but Chico and Cragg. She remained deeply loyal to these two throughout. I won’t pretend Lily and Chico are equal peers in a balanced friendship. But considering the context of 1933, this was nearly as close as that would come for audiences to see in a film. Generally speaking, even the most popular of African American actors and performers in early talkies were not shown anything close to this. Perhaps the 1934 version of Imitation of Life might be on par. Can you think of other examples? For me, their implied loyal bond is one of my favorite angles to this film.

Baby Face 1933 Barbara Stanwyck Reading NietzscheBarbara Stanwyck Reading Nietzsche

Holiday Murder-Suicide.
On Christmas day, after reading a highlighted paragraph from one of Cragg’s Nietzsche books, Lily pauses at “Face life as you find it- defiantly and unafraid. Waste no energy yearning for the moon. Crush out all sentiment.” When a past lover is unable to let go of his obsession for Lily, he stalks her to her new luxurious apartment, but she rejects him. It’s New Year’s when he returns to find his father-in-law is her new Romeo. A murder-suicide between family members is harsh enough. But crushing that much sentiment during the holidays must have been a tough pill for the censors to swallow.

Meeting Her Match.
Sparks fly in the last half-hour of the film when Lily traps a man, Mr. Trenholm (George Brent), of equal abilities in her spider’s web. He’s the new bank President and the chaos ensues when word of their nuptials rocks the confidence of the entire board. By now, Lily has climbed all the way to the top, living her wealthy penthouse lifestyle. When confronted with giving up all her assets to help her new husband, the only man she’s ever loved, she at first reverts to her old ways for self-preservation.

Lily: “I can’t do it. I have to think of myself. I’ve gone through a lot to get those things. My life has been bitter and hard. I’m not like other women. All the gentleness and kindness in me has been killed. All I’ve got are those things. Without them, I’d be nothing.

Don’t worry, Lily figures it out in the end.

Glorification vs Exploitation
After watching this film, as with many Pre-Codes, I often ponder what message audiences actually took home in 1933. Did they think, “Oh thank goodness she finally found a meaningful connection and opened her heart to trust someone,’ or did young women suddenly start reading Nietzsche for tips on how to get ahead in the workplace?” Was this considered a blueprint of what not to do, or were times so tough for some in 1933 that it seemed almost relatable?

I can’t say for certain how the censored package of Baby Face influenced audiences in their everyday lives, upon its initial release. However, I’m glad modern-day audiences are able to enjoy Baby Face as the director intended. This film asks some interesting, thought-provoking questions on the topic of feminism- then and now.

–Kellee Pratt for Classic Movie Hub

When not performing marketing and social media as her day gig, Kellee Pratt writes for her own classic film blog, Outspoken & Freckled (kelleepratt.com). Kellee teaches classic film courses in her college town in Kansas (Screwball Comedy this Fall). Unapologetic social butterfly, she’s an active tweetaholic/original alum for #TCMParty, member of the CMBA, Social Producer for TCM (2015, 2016), and busy mom of four kids and 3 fur babies. You can follow Kellee on twitter at @IrishJayHawk66

Posted in Posts by Kellee Pratt, Pre-Code Corner, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 4 Comments